Some people think that newspaper and TV news are the best way to learn about current events. However, others believe that they can learn news better through social media.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Opinions are divided whether it is better to learn about the currents event through traditional forms of media, such as newspaper and TV or through social networking sites. From my personal perspective, I hold a firm belief that social media is far more convenient when it comes to providing news.
For a variety of reasons, it is certainly better for readers to obtain news information through social media. First, as technology has advanced in leaps and bounds, people in modern era are able to receive the latest news with in just a few fingers taps rather than to actually wait for the news on tv or to physically go to the newsstands on the street to make a purchase for newspaper. In addition to this, traditional newspapers often deliver later message because of the dependence on various processes, such as printing process, whereas netizens are capable of acquiring the news as soon as the information is officially confirmed. Taking a car accident for example, while it takes hours or even up to a day for a journalist to report, internet users can access such information within a few hours.
Apart from the aforementioned practical concerns, there are also several benefits of reading the news reported on newspaper and tv. The greatest advantage is that most information on newspaper and tv is selected by a team of reporters or editors. Therefore, for some people, it is more trusted when the news is presented on the national channels or on the local papers. Moreover, information on the internet can be misleading due to malicious intention, which people report fake news in order to attract more viewers to their websites.
Taking everything into consideration, this reinforces my opinion that it is more convenient for readers to receive new information through social networking platforms.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-21 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | thaokim2003 | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-29 | ashkan zaheri | 95 | view |
| 2021-11-29 | trikhung777 | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-10 | eyraen | 73 | view |
- Some people think that they can create as much noise as they want while others think that the amount of noise people make should be strictly controlled Discuss both the views 89
- It should be more expensive to make sugary products less appealing to consumers in order to encourage them to consume less Many manufactured foods and drinks contain high levels of sugar which can cause many health problems Do you agree or disagree 84
- It is generally believed that some children are born with a natural talents for singing or dancing and adults should focus on developing their children s artistic talents instead of their other skills To what extent to do you agree or disagree 84
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'currents'' or 'current's'?
Suggestion: currents'; current's
...whether it is better to learn about the currents event through traditional forms of medi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, while, apart from, for example, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06666666667 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90968497722 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573333333333 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.1131952961 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.181818182 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265409707279 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106245132196 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823257413951 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166788221522 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924456204952 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.