Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about current events. However, others believe that they can learn news better through other media.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
The predominant way to assimilate knowledge and stay informed about current events is by reading newspapers and magazines that are attributed to the perspective of several individuals. Meanwhile, others reckon that social media is a prevalent tool to learn new things. My point of view inclines to the latter perspective and I will mention both opinions as well as elaborate my own view in this essay.
Several indications are preferable to obtain new information and events from newspapers due to their in-depth coverage of topics such as finance, economy, and social events. These publications often provide well-researched and less distorted information written by experts in their respective fields. Therefore, readers can easily gain deeper insights and focus on their favorite topics and events without the distraction of fake news. For example, male senior citizens in the UK favor newspapers authored by professors for their insights into financial events.
On the other hand, others argue that social media is a valuable means to get a source of information. The strong development of informational technologies lead to the rapid dissemination of news, therefore, individuals can easily access all news worldwide. Admittedly, if an individual studies economic discipline, he/she can also aggregate other news from different fields such as medicine, education, and music. Additionally, should Vietnamese students seek American scholarship information, for example, they might only utilize (rely on) social media for the latest updates.
To sum up, a number of arguments show a preference for learning new events from newspapers, while others incline it should be social media. I strongly agree with the latter perspective because media can offer a more comprehensive and diverse range of information from various societal spheres, meanwhile, newspapers can only be updated part of them by expertise.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-21 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | thaokim2003 | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-29 | ashkan zaheri | 95 | view |
| 2021-11-10 | eyraen | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | CDTSON | 67 | view |
- Friendships that take place online are not as meaningful as those where people meet each other face to face To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glomour and weath than for their achievemnets and this sets a bad example to young people To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- We all work or will work in our jobs with many different kind of people In your opinion what are some important characteristics of a co worker 61
- the maps below show an industrial area in thw town of norbtion and planed future developmant of the site summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the number of classes taught per week by teachers in a school in Someland in the year 2013 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 355, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ective and I will mention both opinions as well as elaborate my own view in this essay. S...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, such as, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58965517241 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07233638975 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627586206897 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5933263051 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.692307692 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248390666417 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084022377224 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045473288868 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147544386055 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546637875074 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.