The chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
The comparison in the average minimum and maximum levels of the two various toxic gases in four different metropolises in 2000 is displayed in the bar chart.
Overall, Mexico was the unhealthiest city because of suffering from air pollution. However, Los Angeles and Calcutta had quite cleaner air than other big towns.
As per data, the maximum level of SO2 and NO2 in Mexico accounted for about 200, running, and the minimum one of the former and latter made up by far below 120. Turning to the other American city, Los Angeles was healthier than the previous metropolis, with the highest figures for both harmful gasses at under 110, showing the lowest levels at less than 11.
Regarding all levels of Beijing, SO2 was more dangerous at 140 than NO2 at only 54, and the smallest level of two toxic substances was recorded at below 30. When it comes to the rest Asian metropolis, Calcutta was not polluted significantly by either SO2 or NO2, with all figures at below 60.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-10 | mnaufaln | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | Sanaullah97 | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | Sanaullah97 | 56 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | Sanaullah97 | 67 | view |
- Despite a large number of gyms a sedentary lifestyle is gaining popularity in the contemporary world What problems are associated with this What solutions can you suggest 89
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying fulltime or part time 78
- Without capital punishment the death penalty our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status Leisure time in a typical week in hour by sex and employment status 1998 99 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 813.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78235294118 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47917973934 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623529411765 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5593543401 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.142857143 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196883576872 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977743155284 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826100518467 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138097029899 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910713207502 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.