The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table provides data about how five different cell phone brands, namely Nokia, Ericsson, Samsung, Motorola and Apple, sold their products from the they 2006 to 2012.
Overall, there are two clear trends visible. Nokia and Samsung were the two make the most sale over the period. Meanwhile, Ericsson and Motorola experienced a downward trend. Although there was no information about the first year, it is noticeable that Apple company sales growth surprisingly fast in 6 years.
In 2006, Nokia was the highest in term of sale with 345 million phones, and with 210 million sales, Motorola was the next leading firm. However, in the next 6 years, these two brands and Ericsson underwent a great decrease. In order words, after reached its peak at 475 million sales in 2008, Nokia figures dropped gradually and ended up at 335 million by the end of the period. Ericsson, starting with 74 million sales, and Motorola numbers followed the same pattern and winded up at exactly 28 million.
In contrast, there was a significant increase in Samsung and Apple figures. To be precise, starting with about half the sales of Motorola, Samsung numbers soared up sharply then became the one with highest sale in 2012 with almost 400 million. Whilst the figures of Apple in the first year was not recorded, it began with a humble number, 2.3 million in 2007. By the year 2010, this figure had exceeded the numbers of Ericsson and Motorola company, and in 2012 it was fivefold those two with 135.8 mobile phones sold.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-15 | nguyenthanhhoa1904 | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-15 | Ngoc Trinh | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-15 | Ngoc Trinh | 56 | view |
| 2022-02-15 | Ngoc Trinh | view | |
| 2022-02-15 | Ngoc Trinh | view |
- The bar chart shows the number of volunteers in New Zealand who helped in sports organizations in 2010 The pie chart illustrates the number of volunteers doing different types of jobs for that same period Summarize the information by selecting and reporti 89
- Some young people look forward to a year of travelling a gap year before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons For others this is an expensive waste of time Discuss both view and give your own opinion 89
- the diagram shows the process in which a tourist resort can develop and grow 86
- The flow chart shows trampling the negative effect of tourists walking in the countryside for the environment Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 78
- Some people suggest that children do not understand the world of work and schools should make all teenagers spend a short time working as well as studying academic subjects To what extent do you agree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'they'?
Suggestion: the; they
...ola and Apple, sold their products from the they 2006 to 2012. Overall, there are two...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
...s soared up sharply then became the one with highest sale in 2012 with almost 400 million. W...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 257.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89883268482 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31369995185 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 106.607317073 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583657587549 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4090576948 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8461538462 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145021925485 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053397588661 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427544119555 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0885204462729 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178636995896 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.