The greatness of an individual can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporaries
Despite the fact that this notion is correct in some cases, it is not always the case. In order to assess the superiority of individuals, we must be able to appropriately interpret the actions they have taken. Because this process can take years, some nation's greatness is commemorated after they have passed away.
Secondly, The situation is entirely different, however, if the current nation is well-educated enough to appreciate, comprehend, and grasp the splendour of someone. Akbar, for example, was rewarded by his king for developing the buoyancy principle. He recognised Akbar' majesty because he was aware of exactly what he had accomplished.
Edward Edison who invented the bulb his greatness is known by everyone this has developed due to some reasons. They couldn't comprehend his thoughts because they didn't fit into their preconceptions at the time. A century or so after Edison's notion was widely accepted, the world recognised Edison as a great scientist. A look at the facts shows that this example validates what we've been saying.
Moreover, In today's world, we have a broad range of options for illustrating our intentions, including patents, magazines, committees, manifestos, and so on. New eras are therefore less likely to follow the given notion when these installations are in place. Based on her work narrative and manifesto, for example, we can judge a politician we can evaluate a sportsperson's brilliance based on their performance in their chosen recreation, which may be seen on television.
In sum, Consequently, we might surmise that the given concept is of little use in today's sensibility. Even so, it was true in some earlier ages, such as during the time of Edison, when there was a serious lack of intellectual ability. In the past, nations had no way of assessing their merit or deducing the virtue of their grandeur; now, however, they can do so thanks to new evidence and technology.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...cause this process can take years, some nations greatness is commemorated after they ha...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...has developed due to some reasons. They couldnt comprehend his thoughts because they di...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...nt comprehend his thoughts because they didnt fit into their preconceptions at the ti...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: we've
... shows that this example validates what weve been saying. [28/12, 1:46 pm] Shivi Si...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, even so, for example, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 340.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07941176471 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8809405303 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597058823529 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8994341282 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.9375 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 5.21951772744 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106478411517 0.243740707755 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0342945235896 0.0831039109588 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044852269327 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0614903152043 0.150359130593 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328625838182 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...cause this process can take years, some nations greatness is commemorated after they ha...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...has developed due to some reasons. They couldnt comprehend his thoughts because they di...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...nt comprehend his thoughts because they didnt fit into their preconceptions at the ti...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: we've
... shows that this example validates what weve been saying. [28/12, 1:46 pm] Shivi Si...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, even so, for example, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 340.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07941176471 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8809405303 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597058823529 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8994341282 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.9375 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 5.21951772744 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106478411517 0.243740707755 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0342945235896 0.0831039109588 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044852269327 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0614903152043 0.150359130593 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328625838182 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.