The graph below shows the population figures for different types of turtles in India from 1980 to 2012.
The given graph illustrates the proportion of Indian turtles’ population among various species between 1980 and 2012. The graph took the figure in 1980 as an index number of 100 percent.
Overall, there is a category of those experiencing eventual increases, including all species and Olive Ridley Turtles, whereas the Green Turtles and Leatherback Turtles got the inverse trend.
In terms of those increasing over time, the figure of the all species section steadily increased at first until peaking in 1987, after which it fluctuated. Despite some dips between the years, the number remained higher than 100, reaching nearly 110. Olive Ridley Turtles got significant but gradual growth in roughly half of the period given, followed by fluctuations and a modest fall in the final years.
On the other hand, Green Turtles experienced an unstable trend. The figure varied through time but overall declined and hit its low of approximately 90. Leatherback Turtles escalated in the first 7 years, sharing the same peak with all species in 1987. However, the figure drastically dropped later by 50 in just 20 years and fell to the low of 55 at the end.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-05 | KayVu | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | GREgirl | 85 | view |
| 2020-10-25 | jessie_12345 | 78 | view |
| 2020-07-22 | vdrobny | 87 | view |
| 2020-07-12 | buimai1412003 | view |
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 84
- the graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 75
- The two maps below show the road access to the hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006 89
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 and 2016 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10526315789 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61137507425 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642105263158 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2397757384 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174203942176 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071194304571 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693031316386 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118742177066 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0974550582314 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.