Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Opinions diverge on whether citizens should participate permanently in the same organization. Some people reckon that this is not a beneficial idea while i am at loggerhead with it
Admittedly, individuals who work for the same organization are more stable in their life. In fact, they do not have to move to anywhere else or manage to get through all of the complex period of resigning and enrolling in another one. While the stage is being done, they might not have the time to take care of themselves as they are still unemployed. Additionally, they will have the same acquaintances as they have already made before and do not have to overcome emotional progress after moving. With the same friends, it is believed to be more comfortable with the work you are doing. In the same organization, you should be already familiar with the work and it will be easier for you to do as your muscle memory can help you with it
However, changing organizations also has many advantages. Firstly, each time you move, you can acquaint yourself with many more friends and if you still keep in touch with them, you will have a wide range of people to assist you. Secondly, each time you work for different agency, you can have the opportunity to learn more things and get familiar with it. Therefore, it is believed to help you in knowledge aspects and increase your intelligence. Eventually, you will probably have many unforgettable moments each time you experience different organizations
By way of conclusion, it is observed to be more beneficial if you enrolled in different courses and organizations
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-25 | cinderel | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | hahannguyen | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Nguyen Thi Thanh Xuan | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-24 | Lunar Tran | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-24 | Lunar Tran | 73 | view |
- The table below shows a survey on the preference of different age groups in a European country on different TV programmes in 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows a typical American and a Japanese office Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The line graph illustrates the amount of spreads consumed from 1981 to 2007 in grams
- The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...hat this is not a beneficial idea while i am at loggerhead with it Admittedly, ...
^
Line 2, column 168, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... anywhere else or manage to get through all of the complex period of resigning and enrolli...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 559, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e you experience different organizations By way of conclusion, it is observed to ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.875 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89911094832 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518382352941 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0813772917 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.545454545 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.09090909091 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178435587686 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832225322664 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821157097858 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108704840679 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382522368255 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.