Economic growth in recent years made some people in both developed countries and developing countries richer. However, research shows that while people in developing countries are happier, people in developed countries seem not happier than before. Why does this happen? What can we learn from it?
Modern industrial civilization has seen significant economic prosperity in recent decades but also engenders disparities in the distribution of positive feelings across the globe. There are a variety of explanations for this trend requiring changes to alleviate the situation and the learnt lessons are paramount.
For one thing, one justification for the trend is that the extra increment of the social economy has accompanied improvement in various aspects of society. The elimination of social problems such as famine and poor medical care has offered a greater sense of material satisfaction as well as security for people who used to live in impoverished regions. This results in the psychological feeling of being dependent on the progress of the society when life is devoid of endeavor to maintain one’s living given the fact that most problems have been resolved. Furthermore, industrialization is only influential in its operation of locality and the distribution of it has widened the gap between developed nations which own more factories or have more industrial areas than the developing one’s. Consequently, residents in the former group will benefit from the rapid evolution and progress of their national economy whereas the other will endure constraints in seeking for a better living standard.
For another, the learnt implication of such disparities towards the same occurrence are indeed profound and require additional attention. The society where humans’ equality is high on the agenda is desirable and should be respected for the merits it brings about. Authorities and political bodies should adopt more policies to ensure the lives of the masses will be generally secured. Individuals, regardless of any social backgrounds should receive the same feelings towards meaningful life as well as human’s right for the united sake of the civilizations where people are globally happy.
To conclude, the existing emotional gap of humanity can be attributed to some factors and the implications of such distribution in positive feeling should be held in higher esteem, requiring the attention of people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-28 | sonnn | 11 | view |
| 2022-01-09 | Nguyễn Xuân Sơn | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-09 | Nguyễn Xuân Sơn | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-09 | Nguyễn Xuân Sơn | 11 | view |
| 2022-01-09 | Nguyễn Xuân Sơn | 11 | view |
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our home leisure and work activities To what extent do the benefits of information technology outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Some people believe that no one should do the same job for all their working life Others argue that doing the same job brings advantages for individuals companies and society Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our home leisure and work activities To what extent do the benefits of information technology outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Today different types of robots are being developed which can serve as companions and workers to help at work and at home Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Some are of the opinion that people are naturally born as good leaders while others feel that leadership skills can be learned Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, so, well, whereas, such as, as well as, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52134146341 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06128988524 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591463414634 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.0711140134 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.916666667 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0634862705782 0.244688304435 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0207830139812 0.084324248473 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338451628139 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0322157206795 0.151304729494 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221075885417 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.