Many people the world over are now more interested in consuming junk food, leading them to gain extra body weight. Consequently, there has been, in recent years, a growing body of opinion in favor of raising the price of nutrient-poor meals in order to decrease their consumption of such items. Being a rational mind, however, I take issue with this notion, for I am of the view that the problem of obesity can only be contained by doing exercise and understanding the disastrous repercussions of eating saturated foodstuff.
Among the ratiocination to buttress my stance, the one that deals with the orthodox solution to reduce overweight is physical activity. In other words, it is next to impossible to fit as a fiddle without doing physical activity. For example, an empirical study conducted by Oxford University reveals that if a person reduces the habit of eating fast food and beverages but does involve in any workout, there is no chance of losing extra weight. Therefore, in order to decrease the number of overweight people, increasing the price of fattening foodstuff would not be the best idea. Individuals should do more exercise for this issue.
Another critical rationale in reference to why the rising price of unhealthy meals is a bad notion is necessarily synonymous with creating unaware citizens in the community. To be more precise, if governments forcefully raise the price of all nutrition poor food, the general public does not understand the deep insight of this decision. On the contrary, people would deliberately avoid intaking unhealthy things provided that governments could wage intensive awareness programs. For instance, 95% of people in Japan are now reluctant to take junk food because the country’s government has conducted campaigns regarding the deadly effects of such items. Hence, building awareness among the public is the most decisive task to control the problem of obesity.
In conclusion, with a view to reducing the problem of obesity, it is necessary to do exercise and comprehend the downside of junk food.
- The world today is a safer place and government should stop spending larger amounts of money on their armed forces Do you agree or disagree 84
- The older generations tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live think and behave However some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generations for modern life To what extent do you agree or disagre 78
- In many countries governments spend a lot of money celebrating national holidays and festivals However some people think that spending money on these celebrations is a waste To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 67
- We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- More and more people in developing countries are purchasing cars for the first time What problems does this cause What do you think are the possible solutions 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...e price of all nutrition poor food, the general public does not understand the deep insight of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18862275449 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86691460038 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586826347305 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1196867965 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.785714286 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221601022231 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690352359336 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477761356181 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122139827634 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383178906622 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.