Some people believe that culture will be ruined if it is used to earn tourism revenue, but others consider that tourism is the only way of protecting a culture. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
With the development of the service-based economy, tourism plays a vital role in the national economy. Many people think that tourism develops too fast and that leads to many matters of concern about the national culture while others believe it helps to maintain culture, especially national culture with distinctive features. Personally, I think that tourism is a key industry that helps develop the economy.
On the one hand, it can be true that tourism brings many positive impacts on maintaining the traditional culture. Firstly, the government spends more on the national budget to rebuild and preserve many monuments, heritage structures, and historical places over the years. This action attracts many visitors to travel and explore amazing things in these countries and thanks to it, the value of culture and history will be introduced to both locals and foreigners. Secondly, tourism is a motivation for locals to protect intact natural habitats and improve the quality of the overall beautification of surroundings to increase the quality of tourism, preserve original culture and advertise the beautiful image of the country to abroad.
On the other hand, there are many drawbacks for the traditional culture that comes from tourism. Nowadays, tourism is a new industry which has more potential revenue. Year after year, commercialization has made people not take their customs seriously, and they gradually change their local natural habitats to satisfy tourism’s demand, which leads to possible loss of cultural practices. For example, Sapa is known as a popular tourist attraction in Vietnam but in recent years, local businesses usually build some tourist places with artificial landscapes that are only used to take a picture or check - in and do not promote their customs. Secondly, the infrastructure is seemingly not built with any particular plan. A number of restaurants, resorts have been springing up that have made Sapa a “big construction site” and lead to the loss of the beauty of old buildings and some heritage places.
In conclusion, it can be undefined that tourism has some negative effect in our life, especially tourism, I believe that tourism is a key field that helps not only to preserve the national culture but also boost the country's development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-20 | thaohienpt008 | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-09 | thaohienpt008 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-19 | cactuss5 | 84 | view |
| 2020-02-04 | mridulaielts | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-11 | nguyen thi thu hien | 86 | view |
- Studies suggested that nowadays children watch more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things What are the reasons And what measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or creative 61
- Some people believe that children of all ages should have extra responsibilities example helping at home or at work Others believe that outside of school children should be free to enjoy their lives Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Companies should provide sports facilities physical acitivites to have a healthy well beings for local communities To what extent do you agree 73
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 89
- These days it is much easier for many people to travel to different countries for tourism than in the past Do the advantages of this development outweigh be far more significant the disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31043956044 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85186924508 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552197802198 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.2002418304 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.071428571 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288296821602 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095749818923 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723816329239 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187204429184 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445781570136 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.