The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar charts illustrate the collected data regarding the occupational and educational status of two demographic groups of alums in the UK in 2008.
Overall, most students chose to study higher while the number of students who took part in voluntary work only accounted for a small percentage in both groups.
The first graph demonstrates that nearly 30,000 students pursued tertiary education, more than 17,700 students sought a part-time job, and only 3,500 students became a volunteer. As can be seen from the graph, over 16,000 students were unemployed after graduation, which is roughly approximate to the number of graduates who worked part-time after college.
The second graph describes a disparate trend. The number of postgraduate students who had a part-time job or pursued further study was nearly identical (both figures were about 2,600 students). There was a considerable unemployment rate as 1,625 students had no jobs even they had gained a postgraduate degree. And only 315 did voluntary work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-03 | trpg143 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | tr_h.20 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | Tran Kim Ngoc Anh | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | rvw | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | quan12341234 | 73 | view |
- The flow chart below shows the procedure to get a driving license in the US. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use
- The chart below shows the changes in car ownership in Great Britain between 1961 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 74
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002
- The chart below shows the changes in car ownership in Great Britain between 1961 and 2001 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for a small percentage in both groups. The first graph demonstrates that nearly...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, regarding, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3375 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86312766044 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66875 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3010318849 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.75 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185832455572 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803665400294 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434032229993 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103268300503 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258737150669 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.