The education of young people is highly prioritized in many countries. However, educating adults who cannot write or read is even more important and
governments should spend more money on this. To what extent do you agree or
disagree?
On the one hand, designing an appropriate curriculum for adults who didn’t have opportunities to go to school is necessary. Actually, if people are sufficiently educated, especially adults, they can contribute more, not only to them but also to the next generations.
One clear example is teaching their children. It is true that parents with whom youngsters spend most time in the first stage of their life play a principal role in educating them beside school. Family members are people supporting teachers teaching the adolescents at home and helping them understand the lessons taught in class more efficiently. In the other words, teaching adults who cannot read or write is the effective strategy to minimize the illiteracy rate of the entire population.
In contrast, I believe that the education for young people should be given the equal attention. There will be numerous serious consequence if we neglect to teach the children who are the next generation contribute to the development of countries. As the results of the growth of children who are not fully educated, the companies will suffer from a shortage of human resource in the area of mind use. Therefore, the governments will have to make more attempt to deal with arising problems.
To sum up, although educating illiterate adults is the significant problem, I personally believe that teaching the children also needs to be equally concentrated.
- Nowadays people are able to use internet to do an increasing number of tasks Is this a positive or negative development 84
- The diagram below shows one method of manufacturing ceramic pots
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days 73
- Some teachers think that international student exchange would be beneficial for all teenage school students Do you think that its advantages would outweigh its disadvantages 56
- The graph below shows the information of communication technology about percentages of people using different devices in the UK between 1998 and 2008
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, so, therefore, in contrast, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1198.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 229.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23144104803 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92680682719 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633187772926 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7439274675 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.909090909 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193851581269 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673197962737 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435146684095 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10563151168 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284850963419 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.