Clay pots of a particular specific design have earlier been found in the surrounding area of the prehistoric village of Karia and so were supposed to have been made exclusively by the people from Karia. However, of late, archeologists discovered a 'Karian' clay pot in Toga, an ancient village across the Mist River from Karia. The Mist River is very deep and wide, and so the ancient Karians could have crossed it only by boat, and no Karian boats have been found. Hence it is obvious that the so-called Karian clay pots are not uniquely Karian.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The argument presented by the author is full of assumptions without evidence. There is no evidence provided about the river if it has changed its course in the intervening period or if there is a rise in the water level. Also, we don't know how thorough was the excavation. Hence this argument is rife with holes making it a faulty argument.
An assumption is made by saying that the clay pots are specifically made by the karians.
But there is a possibility that may be some karian residents who knew the art of making karain clay pots relocated to Toga village due to some reason and continued their legacy of making karian pots in Toga Village. There are many other possibilities that the migrants made these clay pots to earn a living. There is also a possibility that the merchants of Karia village went to the Toga village to sell their unique pots to get more value. Another possibility is, the pot discovered may be similar to the Karian pots but to differentiate, there must be some more information about the design, shapes for both the pots. So specific evidence s needed to assume that Karian pots were not uniquely Karian.
The second premise has no evidence that there is only one way that is via boat to commute to Toga Village from Karia village for the villagers. There is a possibility that there may be another route through land or river that may be less deep and wide.
There is also a possibility that the Karians were ahead of the time and built a bridge over such a deep and wide river. There is no evidence to the statement that no karian boats have been found. and requires more information. As it may be possible that earlier they used the boats but in the latter days maybe the boats have been destroyed due to floods or war or maybe any other reasons. There should be specific evidence to support the argument.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 55 | view |
| 2022-02-01 | koshagohil | 55 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | Khalaneadi1@gmail.com | 55 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | dl25 | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-04 | kaushalsorte | 59 | view |
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 67
- Some people believe that success in creative fields such as painting fiction writing and film making primarily requires hard work and perseverance Others believe that such success mainly requires innate talents that cannot be learned 66
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 66
- The most ideal path for a society to set up its youngsters for positions of authority in government industry or different fields is by imparting in them a feeling of collaboration not rivalry Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you a 75
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 16
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 5 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 333 350
No. of Characters: 1483 1500
No. of Different Words: 162 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.272 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.453 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.405 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 88 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 60 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 41 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 23 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.812 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.553 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.688 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.332 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.487 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.09 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... is a rise in the water level. Also, we dont know how thorough was the excavation. H...
^^^^
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...t know how thorough was the excavation. Hence this argument is rife with holes making...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h holes making it a faulty argument. An assumption is made by saying that the...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arian pots were not uniquely Karian. The second premise has no evidence that ...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 120, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...bridge over such a deep and wide river. There is no evidence to the statement that no...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 196, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...t that no karian boats have been found. and requires more information. As it may be...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.6327345309 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 55.5748502994 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 2260.96107784 68% => OK
No of words: 332.0 441.139720559 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60240963855 5.12650576532 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4695121678 2.78398813304 89% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 204.123752495 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493975903614 0.468620217663 105% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 705.55239521 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.0832611207 57.8364921388 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8823529412 119.503703932 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5294117647 23.324526521 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.17647058824 5.70786347227 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.67664670659 192% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230952365735 0.218282227539 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707179355345 0.0743258471296 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641593599168 0.0701772020484 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117610561605 0.128457276422 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702457586464 0.0628817314937 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.3799401198 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.3550499002 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 12.5979740519 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.32208582834 90% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 98.500998004 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.