The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph compares the amount of time spent on local-fixed, national and international-fixed lines, and mobiles in the UK, over a span of 7 years.
Overall, local-fixed line saw a fluctuation in the call minutes while other two types of call, witnessed an upward trend between 1995 and 2002.
In 1995 ,the number of phone calls using local fixed line stood at about 73 billions. Between 1995 and 1999 this type of call saw a steady increase by 20 billion minutes. Although, by the final ,year this call type had experience a noticeable decrease by the same amount, it was the most popular over this period.
The other two types of call, national and international fixed line and mobile calls saw a rise by approximately 25 and 35 billion minutes respectively. The minutes of mobile phone calls went up significantly, between 1999 and 2001 ,after seeing a slight grows in the first four years, but by the final year it fell by 10 billions whereas national and international-fixed line experienced a steady growth over the same period of time.
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 56
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 67
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... an upward trend between 1995 and 2002. In 1995 ,the number of phone calls using...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rend between 1995 and 2002. In 1995 ,the number of phone calls using local fi...
^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... billion minutes. Although, by the final ,year this call type had experience a not...
^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'experienced'.
Suggestion: experienced
..., by the final ,year this call type had experience a noticeable decrease by the same amoun...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 231, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... up significantly, between 1999 and 2001 ,after seeing a slight grows in the first...
^^
Line 7, column 419, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...perienced a steady growth over the same period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86111111111 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98644571769 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7430184113 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125469047221 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702105326446 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346521427028 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0818357137155 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349362836251 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.