The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The picture describes the number of products transferred in the UK between 1974 and 2002 in four different modes of transport.
In general, it can be seen that there was a similar trend among road, water and pipeline transportation. Another noticeable feature is that goods were mostly delivered by road while the pipeline was the least used for transportation.
In 1974, Roadway had more than 70 million tons of products were transported to the UK while around 40 million tons were delivered via waterway and railway. The least customers used pipeline transporting services in 1974, around 5 million tons. The usage of roadway delivery then witnessed a slight fluctuation before reaching 100 million tons in 2002. There was a significant increase in the amount of waterway transportation from the period between 1978 and 2002, from 40 million tons to around 62 million tons, except for 1998 when the number drop to nearly 50 million tons.
On the contrary with 3 others types of transportation, the demand for using railway services for delivery to the UK remained unchanged after a slight fluctuation in the period between 1978 and 1994 when it dropped from 40 million tons to 35 million tons before raised back to around 40 million tons in 2002. Pipeline delivery services had the least usage demand in 1974, only 5 million tons. However, the number increased significantly in the period between 197 and 1994 when the number of goods transported improved from around 10 million tons to 25 million tons before remaining stable between 1994 and 2002.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-12 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-12 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-21 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and giv 73
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 78
- The diagrams give information about changes in a student s accommodation 61
- Some teachers think that international student exchange would be beneficial for all teenage school students Do you think that its advantages would outweigh its disadvantages 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, while, except for, in general, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 258.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05813953488 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74002498435 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468992248062 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 367.2 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.3576960402 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.5 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202032541186 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111619781897 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126702816352 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187339192253 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.167054511865 0.0819641961636 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, while, except for, in general, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 258.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05813953488 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74002498435 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468992248062 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 367.2 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.3576960402 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.5 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202032541186 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111619781897 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126702816352 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187339192253 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.167054511865 0.0819641961636 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.