TOPIC: Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Museums play a vital role in spreading knowledge. While many of these require an entrance fee, others think it is unnecessary. This essay will discuss why the benefits of collecting admission money in exhibitions do not outweigh its demerits
To begin with, the museums that charge tourists for admission could reduce the number of people visiting. To be specific, there are a great deal of residents who can not afford the entrance fee in exhibitions, so they would not travel to a museum that they have to pay for. For example, the poor may have less chance to visit a museum because of their limited budget, while they have others to worry about such as accomodation expenses or their children’s education fee. As a consequence, fewer people could approach the galleries demanding a fee. Besides, the museums that need an entrance fee to get in may not spread the value of priceless exhibits. Particularly, many people hesitate at visiting an exhibition if they have to spend an amount of money but not know about the true values of artefacts. The galleries having few visitors mean they do not have a chance to show the reason why they are constructed. Clearly, this problem might decrease the value of exhibits.
However, some people still claim that the museums should charge for admission to pay for maintenance costs. They may believe that these places need a budget to ensure the operation involving sanitation costs or labour costs. But I argue that these costs could be covered by the taxpayers' money. Meanwhile, people have a large number of expenses which need paying, so the exhibitions’ entrance fees may make them less interested in artefacts. It seems that they would have less of a chance to increase their knowledge about a country’s culture, history or art.
In conclusion, although some people might think that places of culture should be run like a business, it can also reduce the number of visitors and the interest of them in exhibits. In my opinion, I believe that the disadvantages of admission payment outweigh its advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-23 | Ahmad_off | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-17 | MEBC Class | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-03 | BuiGiaHan | 89 | view |
| 2024-04-08 | reverjae | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-19 | phuong cao | 84 | view |
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 78
- People in some countries owning a home rather than renting one is considered very important Why might this be the case Is this a positive or negative development 78
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 61
- In theie advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- To succeed in a business one needs to know maths To what extent do you agree or disagree 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deals'?
Suggestion: deals
...ting. To be specific, there are a great deal of residents who can not afford the ent...
^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'taxpayers'' or 'taxpayer's'?
Suggestion: taxpayers'; taxpayer's
...hat these costs could be covered by the taxpayers money. Meanwhile, people have a large n...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...taxpayers money. Meanwhile, people have a large number of expenses which need paying, so the exhi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9711815562 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72481396009 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510086455331 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0096382019 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.470588235 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4117647059 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11764705882 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210992867645 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680953435272 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779036150983 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1403429092 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699822305752 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.