The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The line graph represents consumption of hamburgers, pizza and fried chicken by Mauritian teenagers from 1985 to 2015.
What stands out from the graph is that the amount of hamburgers and fried chicken consumed by young people in Mauritius experienced an increasing trend. Whereas, pizza was less and less favored over the period surveyed.
Starting at 60 times eaten per year in 1985, pizza was the main fast food consumption in Mauritius by the youth, followed by a dramatical fall to 10 in 2015. The opposite trend was for hamburgers with only one sixth in comparison with pizza in 1985. This figure witnessed a rocket surge in the number of times consumed to about 71 in the last year of the period shown.
With a reference to fried chicken - the least common among Mauritian teens in 1985. Between 1985 to 2005, there was a sharp growth in the number of consumption from about 5 time to 60 times. In the next ten years, this figure remained unchanged before witnessing a slight rise 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-11 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-03 | Anh15799 | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-03 | Anh15799 | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000 67
- The most important function of music is that it helps people reduce stress To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- The line graph below shows the monthly ridership of four separate transportation forms in a European metropolitan area between 1980 and 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features making comparisons where relevant 90
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76878612717 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53805102373 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578034682081 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8615255023 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6666666667 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176332094546 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720127567712 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651469925914 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111826835064 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464484275189 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.