The bar graph below shows the amount of carbon emissions in different countries during three different years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the bar chart revealing the amount of carbon consumption statistics in six nations (namely USA, Germany, United Kingdom, China, Canada, and India) throughout the period of different years in 1975, 1990 and 2005.
Overall, the quantity of carbon emission in the UK and Germany fell gradually, while others witnessed an upward trend all over the surveyed period. Additionally, the USA has the highest amount of carbon release.
In 1975, approximately 1 200 000 thousand metric tonnes were produced by the USA and this rose rapidly, reaching a peak at 1 600 000 thousand of carbon release in the next 30 years. Despite the leap of the USA in carbon production, Germany and UK proceeded to collapse to around 200 000 and 160 000 thousand metric tonnes respectively. Interestingly, there was a plateau in the amount of carbon discharge in Germany between the year 1975s and 1990s, standing at 250 000 thousand tonnes.
In stark contrast, over 300 000 thousand tones of metric accounted for the number of China carbon released, compared with under 200 000 thousand in the UK and Canada. Following the ceiling trend, the number of carbon emissions measured peaked at around 1 500 000 thousand tonnes in 2005 and over 300 000 thousand tonnes were produced in India, whereas Germany, UK and Canada witnessed only under 200 000 thousand tonnes.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-03-13 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
2022-08-15 | kavi jk | 67 | view |
2022-06-02 | khoapham | 73 | view |
2021-06-21 | dhillonsukh | 67 | view |
2021-06-07 | Bala_s10 | 73 | view |
- Most people are not interested in how their food has been produced They only care about how much it costs How true is this statement What influences people when they buy food 73
- Nowadays there are more opportunities for women than there were in the past Some people think this situation has caused more problems than it has solved What are your opinions on this 78
- The pie charts below give information about the household expenditure of an average US family in different years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Parents often give children everything they ask and let they do what they like Is it good for children What are the consequences when they grow up 89
- The internet has transformed lives and economies but it is turning the world into a global village Soon everybody will think and behave in the same way To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Given is the bar chart revealing the amo...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ifferent years in 1975, 1990 and 2005. Overall, the quantity of carbon emission...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the highest amount of carbon release. In 1975, approximately 1 200 000 thousan...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., standing at 250 000 thousand tonnes. In stark contrast, over 300 000 thousand...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1130.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02222222222 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63182422769 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.3114172528 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.25 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.125 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0936056228917 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567985812453 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406584986791 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0767758614362 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416372952149 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.