The map shows the changes to a residence hall between 2010 and the present. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The map give information about a residence has changed between 2010 and today.
It is clear that the student-bedroom witness changes with the most noticeably being the car parking and en-suite room in main entrance.
The hall was designed in 2010 and included three student-bedroom, one bathroom, kitchen and one main hall. The main hall directly accessible one student-bedroom and the kitchen was designed is front of second student-bedroom. Look at the map in 2010, student accommodation building third student-bedroom located to the left of the garden. With living room and bathroom located convenient way for student personal hygiene and relaxing, living room near bedroom and bathroom located behind a living room.
While the entryway remains in the west, it becomes noticeably narrower and go to hallway we will see en-suite room first. Meanwhile compared in 2010, today student accommodation building has five student-bedroom and a bathroom and kitchen. Besides, three bedroom built side by side and fourth bedroom located behind first bedroom and near bathroom. However a kitchen was greatly extended to a kitchen and social area. Today the garden was replaced by a large car parking. Summarize the information by a selecting and reporting the main features can be seen that, student accommodation building today modern than in 2010 and complete necessary facilities for student.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-05 | Lily Ha | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | hanbnguyenle | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-05 | Nicole Yu | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | nle2006 | 61 | view |
- The table chart show the population of New Zealand between 2011 and 2012 67
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Some countries alluring old people to vocations to whatever age that they want This essay will examine both sides of argument before a reasoned conclusion is drawn 56
- The table below gives information on consumer spending items in five different countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart below give information about the UK s aging population in 1985 and makes predictions for 2035 Summarizes the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table below shows population figures for 4 countries for 2003 and projected figures for 2025 and 2050 Population million Countries 2003 2025 2050 Argentina 34 48 62 Indonesia 238 274 312 Italy 54 47 45 Republic of Korea 48 52 52 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 122, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...allway we will see en-suite room first. Meanwhile compared in 2010, today student accommo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 349, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...behind first bedroom and near bathroom. However a kitchen was greatly extended to a kit...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, look, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1174.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41013824885 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0610180652 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539170506912 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1381617148 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8333333333 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0833333333 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152681814631 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072803985826 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955232070589 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140083224854 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103800830989 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.