In recent times, economic growth has helped many become richer, both in developed and developing countries. However, those in developed countries are not as happy as they were in the past.
Why is this?
What can be learned from this?
In contemporary society, as the global economy has advanced in leaps and bounds, a large group of individuals has become wealthier regardless of the country’s status. However, it is believed that these countries are dissatisfied compared to their previous generations. The following paper will be looking at the roots as well as examining the lessons deduced from this situation.
For a variety of reasons, economic development has brought a fortune to a large group of people in developed and developing nations. Following globalisation, economical borders have been broken down in order to facilitate trading activities, generating a diverse range of career paths for people to run their own business or to seek a position in multinational companies. Hence, numerous people have gained a chance to reach remarkable income levels in various industries, such as business or engineering. Nonetheless, to achieve such significant accomplishment in modern era, people may have to exert time and effort extensively, which often takes up a considerable part of their day. Consequently, certain detrimental impacts can be anticipated, notably stress or depression, leading to dissatisfaction among the population. In contrast, to achieve a strong income level in the past was relatively more viable, where occupations do not demand a person to be highly skilled, through either trainings or experience.
Apart from the causal analysis, several lessons can be absorbed from this trend. First, it would be justifiable to believe that economic expansion would result in an increasing number of employment opportunities for people regardless their origins. If they can utilize such advantage, they will be able to join the wealthy class in society. Another note-worthy point is that money should not be considered as the main factor of happiness. In the modern world, having money means that people are required to spend a great deal of their time working. As a result, life would be meaningless if people are not able to spend their money with their beloved ones despite possessing a significant fortune.
Taking everything into consideration, this reinforces my perspective that globalization can be seen as a cause to enrich people’s asset but this can also lead to a sense of unhappiness among them. However, it can also be deduced that by capitalizing on economic prosperity, one may enrich themselves financially. Lastly, through the examination of the matter, it is imperative that one understand the social cost involved in achieving financial success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-05 | Mollymaul | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-17 | tttran12 | 89 | view |
| 2022-06-20 | trikhung777 | 89 | view |
| 2022-06-10 | trikhung777 | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-19 | phuongchi17899 | 84 | view |
- Some people think that because children find subjects such as mathematics and philosophy difficult they ought to be optional instead of compulsory To what extent do you agree 67
- Some people think that they can create as much noise as they want while others think that the amount of noise people make should be strictly controlled Discuss both the views 89
- In the future it is expected that the proportion of older people will be higher than that of young people in many developed countries What are the positive or negative effects of this development 78
- The shortage of housing in big cities can cause severe consequences and only government action can solve the problem To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- in some countries owning a home rather than renting one is more important for people Why might this is a case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, lastly, look, may, nonetheless, so, well, apart from, in contrast, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2168.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 398.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4472361809 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17434047697 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597989949749 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 688.5 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0481499861 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.444444444 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21303698369 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628682590478 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594493952117 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121037687764 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00727992034007 0.056905535591 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.