Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts.
Educators follow different methods to teach students. Teaching is a broad subject; every educator has their own way of teaching students. The prompt suggests that the educators should teach facts with the help of ideas, trends & concepts. Articulating a fact can be interesting if supported by ideas & concepts. Without ideas & concepts, a fact can look dull & difficult to remember for students. Anything is easy to understand only if supported by logical backing. In my opinion I strongly agree with this recommendation that educators should back up the facts with ideas & concepts for two reasons.
Firstly, stating facts without any logical explanation would limit the analytical & cognitive thinking of students. During the early stages of a child, the ability to develop cognitive skills is a vital component of education. It not only helps a child to further in education but also helps a student to deal with the situations in life. Consider a concept like newton’s third law, ‘for every action there’s equal and opposite reaction’, If this is stated, a student might not understand the real usage of this law, if supported with an idea of a rocket it would make students think and understand the concept clearly. And considering the subjects like space & rockets are always interesting to children, it makes it easy for them to understand the fact in a right sense. The example case of rocket would help students to analyse the mechanism & will let them extend the application of the same to various fields.
Secondly, stating facts without any backing would not create interest in students which would confine them to remembering the facts without understanding the importance of the stated facts and its applications. For instance, consider the fact that the ‘leaves are green’. If a student can question the fact that why the leaves are green, why not red or white in general? So, if this can be backed by the idea of a pigment called chlorophyl and photosynthesis, one can easily related to the fact that the leaves are green. Any fact can be actually questioned by a student, and can be supported only by supporting it with ideas or concepts. In the same way consider an example that the rain drops are spherical. Why the drops take the form of a sphere is because of the minimum surface area can be only achieved by sphere. Any fact backed up by idea or concept makes it easy to understand & also interesting.
Of course, some may argue that facts should be stated without idea & trends, but precisely shouldn’t teaching inculcate the process of analytical ability and a way to question the facts? Going forward, the way a student thinks & arrives at a conclusion by analysing facts is crucial & detrimental in life. So, educators should always support their teaching of facts with supported facts, ideas & concepts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | ADIBA IBNAT HOSSAIN | 54 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | kayli.vesel@gmail.com | 62 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | Andrewbanda70 | 75 | view |
| 2023-01-18 | vrajgparekh | 58 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 477, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'relate'
Suggestion: relate
...phyl and photosynthesis, one can easily related to the fact that the leaves are green. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[4]
Message: The verb 'shouldn't' requires base form of this verb: 'teach'
Suggestion: teach
... idea & trends, but precisely shouldn’t teaching inculcate the process of analytical abi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, third, for instance, in general, of course, in my opinion, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2371.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 471.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03397027601 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80249003193 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454352441614 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 716.4 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.6510561095 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7916666667 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38059445182 0.243740707755 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122751614659 0.0831039109588 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766932135627 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26777475234 0.150359130593 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720125602863 0.0667264976115 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.