In some countries, if people need to find work, they have to move away from their families and their friends. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Occupational problems are still an unresolved issue due to today’s cut-throat labor market, which is necessary for job seekers working overseas far from their families and also their acquaintances. Although there are some reasonable causes to prove this phenomenon, I do strongly suppose that the demerits outweigh the merits, and my opinions, as well as examples, will be substantiated in the following essay.
To begin with, the biggest benefit in terms of working abroad is making enough for a living. To be more specific, the economic migrants who join the global migration of labor are able to gain their income for living costs in daily life such as electricity bills, tuition fees, etc. Let’s take the French employees who come from North America as an example. Provided that they are working in the construction or service industries, they are able to manage their lives and support their families as well. Despite the major distance, these breadwinners have to migrate in order to prevent their families from remaining poverty-stricken and improve their standard of life.
On the other hand, living in a host country with a highly competitive job market may raise a range of issues, particularly related to different cultures and social behaviors.
First of all, local individuals are sometimes prejudiced against migrants and their families, based on some aspects of life, such as region, language, and religion. Therefore, employees may find it a challenge to be integrated into society. Moreover, working in different places means people may come across controversy among colleagues or even financial issues because of the low-paid but highly effective work. Furthermore, the employees may sometimes be home-sick, which influences the working process. Last but not least, overseas jobs prevent people from increasing family relationships among close-knit families and consequently have a negative impact on children whose parents do not take care of them. It results in the social behaviors of kids who lack love, dedication, and affection.
In conclusion, when the labor market becomes more and more competitive, people find it necessary to attend to global migrations of labor to support families. Having said that, I strongly believe the government should take more accounts into it and implement some solutions for alleviating the unemployment rate at present times in order to avoid some bad circumstances that affected both society and the juveniles. If not, the effects will put a serious threat to our lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-07 | uyenmia | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-08 | hinhin411 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | Zeroplague0407 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | Vivi_peach | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | thaoduong1902 | 78 | view |
- In some countries if people need to find work they have to move away from their families and their friends Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this and how can people research this 84
- Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15 while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school What are the benefits of each system Which do you think is a better educational system 87
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 89
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2140.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3634085213 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89036221866 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601503759398 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 666.9 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1652283176 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.882352941 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4705882353 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2352941176 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278248656578 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749417045342 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670712846947 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132368946488 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734698275419 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2140.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3634085213 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89036221866 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601503759398 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 666.9 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1652283176 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.882352941 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4705882353 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2352941176 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278248656578 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749417045342 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670712846947 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132368946488 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734698275419 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.