Schools should do more to prepare students for the non academic aspects of adulthood Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing

Essay topics:

Schools should do more to prepare students for the non-academic aspects
of adulthood.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or
disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the
position you take. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to
address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used
to challenge your position.

Education has been a hot-button issue in today's world. Especially, after the enforcement of laws like "No Child Left Behind" and "Education for All". In broad terms, a school is a place where a child learns how to tackle the real challenges of life. Real challenges like facing failure, decision making, managing stress, etc. No one in this world can give a concrete solution to such challenges, they are learned with experience throughout life. These Real-Life challenges can alternatively be named Non-Academic Aspects of Adulthood. Thus, the school is a place where an individual can be shaped to face these challenges, and hence, I totally agree with the author's claim that schools should indeed do more to prepare students for these non-academic aspects of adulthood.

Schools today focus more on the theoretical aspect of every subject. Students are forced to learn subjects like history, math, science, geography, etc. Advanced concepts like triple integration and differentiation are being added to the course curriculum having known that only a tiny fraction of students are going to use such concepts in their future(probably those who plan to get into the teaching department). Schools should include subjects that help the students gain practical exposure. Such exposures would help them explore the real world and have an idea of the most likely challenges they will be facing in the near future. This makes it clear that practical knowledge helps a student to plan and prepare for real-life challenges while theoretical knowledge helps them create a solid foundation for themself. Thus, no student should be let out of school without having basic intellectual skills but should also be exposed to the pragmatic world in their early stages of life.

Furthermore, even tech companies today tend to hire candidates with more practical knowledge and the ones who have better approaches to problem-solving. These companies require their employees to go beyond theoretical knowledge and apply real-life problem-solving skills. Famous questions raised during interviews like: How would you cope with strict deadlines? How would fit yourself into an environment where your team members have opposing viewpoints? This brings us to the next most neglected topic by schools Stress Management. As we grow up, another thing that intensifies in life is Stress. Stress management is something that schools should teach the students in their early stages of life. This would help them grow as sensible individuals and manage life tasks efficiently even in stressful situations. Having these values learned in the school itself would help them understand the perspective of life in a better way and lead a successful life as a responsible citizen.

To reiterate, no child should be allowed to leave school without a basic understanding of quants and verbal etiquettes. In addition to today's teaching techniques, school courses should adopt a 60-40 teaching ratio, where 60% consists of theoretical knowledge and the remaining segment should purely focus on practical (out-of-the-book knowledge). One such way could be the inclusion of field trips for students. Having adopted such school curriculums, the youth will be prepared to compete in the global economy and would also be able to fix some terrible issues afflicting our world.

Votes
Average: 9.4 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-04 sunnyojh 50 view
2023-07-09 Sakshi Jain 70 view
2023-07-01 Gnyana 58 view
2023-06-22 Newmember_69 58 view
2022-12-21 Christiana Longe 33 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, thus, while, another thing, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2831.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 525.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39238095238 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93105291692 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 215.323595506 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525714285714 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 840.6 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.6237661637 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.851851852 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170466251155 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476274743173 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522952539088 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105096019166 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322803475459 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.