Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15, while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school. What are the benefits of each system? Which is better?
Education methods varies across the world, while several education systems force students to study a broad range of subjects until they finish high school, some others allow students to concentrate on particular subjects from the age of 15. Although both forms of education bring definite advantages to students, I believe that focusing on several specific subjects is more beneficial.
On the one hand, it is true that a wide range of compulsory subjects is a superior preparation for later life. Off-springs generally are not into studying at young age; therefore, forcedly exposing them to multiple subjects probably will help them discover passion and innate talent in certain fields and nurture those when growing up. As a matter of fact, every subject is taught in curriculum for solid reasons. For example, Math means to develop children's logical thinking skills, while Literature teach sympathy and the beauty of life. Science explains astonishing phenomenon whereas Art may discover another Picasso for mankind.
On the other hand, I favour a system in which students start focusing on specific subjects when they enter high school for two important reasons. Firstly, it is unnecessary to make students all subjects once they advance to high school. At the age of 15, adolescents will already be able to aware of their own talents, hence, there is no need to continue learning all subjects mandatorily. Secondly, it trains more specialists for the society compared to the other type of education. Learning all subjects will definitely be more time-consuming and therefore accounting more concentration and effort than picking several of them. As a consequence, comprehensive courses takers have less time left to practice their favourable aspects compared to those who focus on several topics. Besides, teenagers should spend time to develop other soft and social skills by participating in extracurricular activities or seeking part-time jobs to prepare for adulthood; their life should not revolve only around studying.
In brief, although studying a wide range of subjects can help children identify their gifts, paying attention to certain area grants students time to dig deeper to their fields and thus creates more professors for the community.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-13 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | phamnhung | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | Rahat | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-08 | phuongnguyen1234 | 61 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | xuananhle | 84 | view |
- In some countries few young people go to classical music concerts or play classical music Why Should more young people be encouraged to attend and learn 84
- The charts show the proportion of holidaymakers of one region staying in different types of accommodation in three different years
- Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together Discuss both views and state your own opinion 61
- Cyclists and car drivers today share the same road cause some problems What are the problems What can be done do to reduce these problems 84
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, for example, in brief, as a matter of fact, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39548022599 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7999580486 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61581920904 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7449119039 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.333333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2666666667 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358263674634 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113836406148 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120103352599 0.0667982634062 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223225452306 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113671832373 0.056905535591 200% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.