Should the government make university education free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Should the government make university education free for all students no matter what financial background they have. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

In recent years, many people promote for free-college policy because they believe that pursuing higher education is a human right and the government has the responsibility for the provision of free-of-charge education. This phenomenon has both advantages and disadvantages. Personally, I would contend that this policy is positive in the aggregate.

There are several reasons against abolishing college tuition. On the individual level, the free-college policy can increase the enrollment rate. The more affordable tuition fees are, the more bachelor's degree holders there are. As a result, the job market possibly becomes extremely competitive, and the number of unemployed bachelor's degree holders will increase. On the societal level, the provision of free-of-charge higher education put a strain on government coffers, causing tax hikers and reduced welfare among others.

Apart from the practical disadvantages expressed above, I believe that a free-college policy can bring several benefits. Firstly, every student can get into higher education more actively. Unless educational institution tuition is covered by the government, students, especially people from poorer households, will not be able to freely pursue college because of financial burdens. Entitle to university, they can stand a better chance of landing higher-paid jobs. Secondly, this policy reduces educational inequality in society. The underprivileged have opportunities to attend a university and improve their life quality, bridging the inequality gap. This policy acts as a precursor to a civilized society

In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, I firmly believe university tuition waivers may be detrimental in the short term, on the contrary, will have long-term advantages.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-01-01 tteruchan65 89 view
2023-10-09 kienbanhkem 78 view
2023-08-26 Kiwi 84 view
2023-08-23 dorae 67 view
2023-08-19 dorae 67 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, apart from, in conclusion, as a result, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87644787645 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1638188013 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606177606178 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.8125459027 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.466666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143707056585 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424760419438 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426362006117 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0904714202341 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262681973468 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 50.2224549098 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.