Question: Some people believe that everyone has a right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Whether all high school leavers, irrespective of their financial background, should be entitled to free university studies has been a topic of vigorous debate, with some fervently advocating this idea. Others, myself included, however, believe that free tertiary education would come at the expense of many consequences for both the recipients and the government.
Granted, proponents of free-of-charge university education often cite its better chances of students securing well-paid jobs, especially for those who are underprivileged. Qualifications gained from higher education undoubtedly serve as a testament to the ability of employees, leading to potential job attainment and hence quality improvement. However, herein lies the rub: with a larger number of graduates, there might be increased competition in the job market. This, as a result, renders the possibility of getting a job in the future increasingly difficult.
The consequence of tuition-free university education is further strengthened by its impact on the government. Providing students with cost-free higher learning, including money, infrastructure, and faculty salaries, will put a strain on the government's coffers. This requires substantial resources, potentially leading to increased tax costs and the potential reallocation of funds from other critical sectors. Aside from this, zero-cost education can also be a result of the reduced value of degrees. If a large portion of the population holds university degrees, the perceived value of these degrees in the job market may decrease. This could result in a situation where having a degree becomes less of a distinguishing factor for employment, rendering qualifications secondary to job applications, making it harder for people to land a job as there are more complicated criteria required, such as test assessment, work experience, and temporary or contract work.
In conclusion, while there are justifications for advocating free tertiary education, I am against this policy, considering the detrimental impacts it has on both the government and the grantee.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-01 | tteruchan65 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | Kiwi | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | dieulinhxinhgai | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | dieulinhxinhgai | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | dieulinhxinhgai | 61 | view |
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility 89
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowl 89
- The graph below shows the percentages of tourists who used different types of transport to travel within a particular nation between 1989 and 2009 Each tourist may have used more than one type of transport Summarize the information by selecting and report 84
- Some children spend hours every day on smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- In many countries many children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people believe that the government has the responsibility to deal with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, second, so, then, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80582524272 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34348534172 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644012944984 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7937282734 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7692307692 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173648659804 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550162590065 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441677658505 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103186386531 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415821354439 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.