As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that the user should cover the costs. Discuss and give your opinion.
In modern society, the astonishing of cars has driven to broadening road systems. It is thought that investing money for infrastructure was the onus of the governments while others believed that traveller should pay for it. From my perspective, this funding should be paid for by the government.
Admittedly, expanding the road does a favor for residents in terms of safety and convenience. First, travelers can easily move on the road during rush hour without worrying about traffic congestion. Besides, hardly commuters to hustle with other vehicles due to road extension, facilitating a more comfortable journey. Therefore, travelers grant for road maintenance costs which can understandable. However, it is difficult for all travelers to contribute money to this expansion. To be more specific, people who cannot afford their daily lives are unlikely to spend other sums of money on public works.
Therefore, enlarging road systems should be the government's duty. To begin with, investment in infrastructure consists of road improvements so authorities should responsible for that. Each year, residents have paid a huge amount of tax for the national budget in order to improve their quality, and requesting government to meet their needs is conspicuous. Additionally, it is an undeniable truth that road modifications require a tremendous amount of money, which is beyond the user’s financial capability. Apparently, governments cannot force their inhabitants to spend a lot on upgrading rod systems. Besides, the role of authority has been to enhance citizens’ standard of living. In fact, the efficiency in road transport is the foundation of a country’s economy, and therefore it would be wrong if governments did not give this top priority.
To conclude, although the argument in favor of road enhancement costs belongs to travelers, I gravitate forward that governments should be the ones who take responsibility for this.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-10 | Manideep Macherla | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | ozair | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | ozair | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-19 | xiao_alatus | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-01 | lehonganh1212 | 73 | view |
- The below compared 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010 61
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaur dodo There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation 82
- The graph below shows the percentages of tourists who used different types of transport to travel within a particular nation between 1989 and 2009 Each tourist may have used more than one type of transport Summarise the information by selecting and report 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...e, enlarging road systems should be the governments duty. To begin with, investment in infr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, while, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51333333333 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.199138773 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1221495565 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2941176471 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6470588235 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29411764706 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328789784695 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102024047559 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664038116117 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208768812925 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034555330244 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.