Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
It’s hard to deny that workers definitely feel easy if they do similar tasks all day long, and such a fact may mislead impressionable people to generate the opinion that workers are more content when they do rather the same tasks for a whole day. However, such a statement suffers from both logical and factual fallacies, and it should be examined meticulously. As far as salary, efficiency, and the sense of fullness are concerned, I strongly hold that workers are more satisfied when they have various types of tasks to do during the workday.
First and foremost, workers can have higher salaries, as they complete multiple tasks which indicate that they are experienced and comprehensive workers in the field who deserve high salary. Meanwhile, the variable outstand achievements can earn them multiple award money. Not to mention that the plentiful and expert experience make it easier for workers to get promoted or hopping for a better job.
Furthermore, according to a science finding made by Stanford researchers, people are more efficient when they are assigned with adequate and multiple tasks, not to say the workers. Take the case of Wang Sanxi, one of the typical and innovative workers in China, who once appealed to offer workers different types of tasks but the same amount during the workday in his factory. As the result, the outputs boosted about 15%. Had it not been for the multiple tasks, the human labor force of workers would never surge in a short time.
Nevertheless, a voice arises that similar tasks provided workers with rather simple work so that it’s more comfortable and easier for workers to complete what they need to do. However, when you put your foot in workers shoes, what it feels like if your job is totally the same in one day, in a whole week or even a whole year? It is definitely tedious and boring. When your do certain thing overly, even the sweetest work in your heart before turns into something you can hardly bear. Therefore, it’s more humane when workers are offered different types of job.
In a nutshell, I maintain that workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of jobs to do during the workday all day long. Admittedly, as my favorite quote from James Madison goes, as long as the reason of man continues fallible, different opinions will be formed, and some people may oppose me. However, I believe they will compromise after being exposed to my article.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-05 | Zmx_6 | 90 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
- All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their study of field is 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave 90
- Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams 85
- All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their study of field is 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...rkers are more satisfied when they have many different types of jobs to do during the workday ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2032.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88461538462 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51951976469 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533653846154 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9270909861 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.888888889 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27777777778 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.546368739108 0.236089414692 231% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159140824018 0.076458572812 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.185221297375 0.0737576698707 251% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304450001305 0.150856017488 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143265570504 0.0645574589148 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.