Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.
To what extent do you agree with this view ?
Nowadays governments are focusing on the social sides of arts and the influential
developments of it that can enhance the well-being of the society, so the expenditures on supporting arts would rise as a consequence. Moreover, by considering the abilities of art in representing a nation’s cultures and values, I’m opposed to people who label art as a waste of money.
Looking at psychological components, the more artists in society rivals more kids who regard art as an interesting field for investing their exertion and time. Subsequently, they will adopt a creative and innovative perspective in their life course, meaning that these kids won’t be replaced by a robot in the near future because, although the recent developments in technology have tried to stimulate the arts by using AI, all of them have failed due to the lack of creativity.
Another point that worth to mention is that by supports of governments and helping the artist to subsidize their work, by lending them money or running their exhibitions for free, it is possible for the young to consider art as a lucrative industry that its duty is to express the society's concerns, also breaking the borders in order to redefine what is thought of reasonable in our modern society in which people suffer from stereotypes, climate change, wars, poverty, and etc.
In line with immeasurable benefits that art can bring for a society, like bringing up innovative students and thought leaders who consider art not as a side hustle, but as their future, it's easy to conclude that government spending on art might be actually reasonable in many ways.
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents for instance for sport or music and others are not However it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician Discuss both these views and 73
- In many countries people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could Why do you think this is What can be done to change this 78
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 84
- Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas in words pictures music or film in whichever way they wish There should be no government restrictions on what they do To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- Some people think that some types of criminals should not go to prison Instead they should do unpaid work in the community To what extent do you agree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 472, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...eotypes, climate change, wars, poverty, and etc. In line with immeasurable benefits tha...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, look, moreover, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04089219331 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93105173058 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60594795539 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 16.0721442886 37% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 20.2975951904 217% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 111.707455237 49.4020404114 226% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 226.0 106.682146367 212% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 44.8333333333 20.7667163134 216% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160499475735 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850171449652 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500874070554 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094575811465 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408993086777 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.7 13.0946893788 189% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.82 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.5 11.3001002004 181% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.84 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.1190380762 194% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.