Meerkat

Essay topics:

Meerkat

It is conventionally believed that individuals gain nothing from altruistic acts. However, recent study shows that individuals gain benefits from performing altruistic acts.
Opposing the passage, scientists prove in the lecture that meerkats gain benefits being sentinels. They have the right to eat first. The lecture mentions that meerkats usually stands guard with a full stomach.
It is believed that meerkats gain safety while being stand-guards, disputing the passage. In the passage, it states, meerkats have lower possibility to survive if it is alone. Actually, sentinels usually stand guard near burrow, after releasing an alarm, it can immediately hide in it.
The lecture also states, they have a higher survival rate. They are more likely to escape. They see the predators first, the other feeding group scatters everywhere or gather together, they will draw the predators’ attention n away from the sentinel. It increases the chances of the sentinel’s survival.
In contrary to the passage, human beings also gain something from performing altruistic acts. If you give a kidney to a relative or stranger, the majority say you gain nothing. But you will get none- material appreciation. This gift is far more valuable than actual objects.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-01-02 villian7 3 view
2022-10-13 Shubham Patel 82 view
2022-09-16 ayumiyazaki 90 view
2022-09-12 ayumiyazaki 81 view
2022-05-10 Pri_Judy 80 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user ayumiyazaki :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 196.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44387755102 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81645130602 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612244897959 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.487534736 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.6875 110.228320801 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.25 21.698381199 56% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.125 7.06452816374 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164838633368 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603243485914 0.0996497079465 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104654397184 0.0662205650399 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102561218773 0.162205337803 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126417629267 0.0443174109184 285% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 53.8541721854 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.38 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.