Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Due to the fact that same goods can be purchased anywhere globally, the indistinguishability among nations is increasing considerably. This seems to be a negative trend for it brings about either cultural diversity annihilation or travel industry obsolescence.
Each country’s identity and history are exposed to dying out. To illustrate, in a number of provinces of my country, a large number of people wear local clothes that have rooted robustly in our customs. Yet, many Iranians would rather shop for fashionable clothes from high-end transnational stores rather than purchase elegant attire with dazzling decoration expressing our rich historical background . Therefore, in the future local clothes are vanished leading to the next generation's unawarwness about what precious outfits could have been worn by their grandparents. As a result of that, the specification as well as uniqueness of a state will have been doomed to fade totally.
In addition, on account of globalization, deprivation of societal distinction could generate a huge impact on the tourism sector. Numerous individuals desire to pay a visit to another place to gain unique experiences. To prove this, Indian food is one out of the most engrossing grounds to international tourists to add India to their vacation list template, however, Idian restaurants could be effortlessly observed and found all over the world. As long as the travel budget is taken into consideration, this signifies the people's lack of necessity for flying to India to taste them in person. As a consequence, this would terminate in a decrease in the number of foreign visitors.
In conclusion, to set a platform for all nations to have access to the same products used everywhere, is a defective trend that arouses various regions to fail to keep their own nationhood. This would eventually pose a threat to cultural heritage and tourism rate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-01 | trpg143 | 89 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | minhnhat230602 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | minhnhat230602 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | minhnhat230602 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Nowshin Tabassum | 89 | view |
- In many countries people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could Why do you think this is What can be done to change this 78
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 47
- In many countries people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could Why do you think this is What can be done to change this 78
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged Others believe that children s who are taught to co operate rather than compete become more useful adults disscus both view and give your own opinion 56
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 117, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...in a number of provinces of my country, a large number of people wear local clothes that have roo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 401, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...xpressing our rich historical background . Therefore, in the future local clothes ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30897009967 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17363679831 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651162790698 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2462070608 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.142857143 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0942569017964 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0294484381691 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0235514818521 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0575543748201 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02244823761 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.