Different people have different approaches to life. Some prefer daily routines while others enjoy having new experiences. Which category do you fall into and why?
Give reasons for your answer and use specific examples to support your answer.
To the joy of living, different individuals could apply the various means to fullfill their own. There have been those who are looking for stable daily-routine-life; meanwhile, others could seek for having different experiences to gain knowledge. To my point of view, I would prefer the life with full of experiences that could bring a lot of benefits.
First and foremost, people prefer unchangable daily routines because they are afraid of the unknown risks which an unstable life could bring. For a clue, the average millennial workers often think their day-to-day office work is tedious. Being still on the thought, they accept doing those tasks every day, since they believe in such a steady job will help them become more financially secure in the old age. Furthermore, some people find it perfectly comfortable to live a settled life. They do not need to learn about new happenings or even challengings in the outside world as they love to live a peaceful life with their family.
On the other hand, to my thoughful suggestion, a colorful life with new experiences bears numerous benefits. Firstly, having different backgrounds makes a person gain knowledge daily, thereby developing themselves. Currently, in a dynamic world, most companies will hire people with rich experience due to the fact that these people can quickly adapt to new situations. Secondly, living a colorful life helps people to have more faith in life by finding more joy in different aspects of life. It is a fact that the suicide rate in developed countries with a day-to-day work culture like Japan is increasing; they even have a forest called the suicide forest. One of the reasons for this alarming situation is that Japanese workers are losing interests in life after days of doing repeatable jobs. Experiencing new things helps people get more creative and handful in mind about life, thereby improving problems like the happened in Japan.
In conclusion, those several reasons could explain why people prefer an unchanged daily routine. However, in my certain perspective, the benefits of a life with full of experiences hugely outweigh that of a stable life somehow and being worth considering to settle and retain the joy for all the good.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-07 | Luisjackiet | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-06 | Luisjackiet | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-06 | Luisjackiet | 80 | view |
| 2022-10-06 | Luisjackiet | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-06 | Luisjackiet | 78 | view |
- In many parts of the world children are given more freedom than in the past Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Recent research has shown that business meetings and training are increasingly taking place online What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 84
- Nowadays it is common for people to get married and have children in their thirties rather than when they are younger Do you agree or disagree that this trend will benefit society 56
- The treat of nuclear power weapons maintains world peace Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- There are an increasing number of people who do not know their neighbours What causes this situation How to solve it 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 244, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'considering settling'.
Suggestion: considering settling
...f a stable life somehow and being worth considering to settle and retain the joy for all the good.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10626702997 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73900924963 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577656675749 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3255499021 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.235294118 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5882352941 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256334174462 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872420472131 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582635993912 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163791011632 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459509017538 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 244, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'considering settling'.
Suggestion: considering settling
...f a stable life somehow and being worth considering to settle and retain the joy for all the good.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10626702997 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73900924963 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577656675749 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3255499021 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.235294118 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5882352941 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256334174462 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872420472131 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582635993912 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163791011632 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459509017538 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.