The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012.
The graph illustrates the percentage of men and women academic staff members across the faculties of a main university in 2012. Overall, it is noticeable that the highest percentage was 80% that was of female from engineering faculty whereas the same faculty had the leaat percentage of male which was only 15%. In the year 2012, it can be seen that the academic male staff percentage in faculty arts was 45% which lagged by 5% form female of same faculty. Similarly, 70% of members were female in education faculty but only 25% were male. In case of business faculty, men were found to be more by 30% in comparison to women that is 35%. The academic staff percentage of male and female in medicine faculty was seemed to be quite similar; female percentage led by nearly 2% only where male percentage was 50. Furthermore, in the faculty of science, there was a difference of 30% between male and female staff; male was 65%.At last, looking at the data of law faculty, it was observed that male staff was 60% and female was 40%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-10 | Angina | 67 | view |
| 2022-10-13 | Angina | 56 | view |
| 2021-05-05 | shaimaa elyamny | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-23 | sonia 7022 | 84 | view |
| 2020-10-28 | thatfrostbyte | 73 | view |
- The given graph shows the proportion of four different materials which were recycled between 1982 to 2010 in a particular country 73
- Solar energy is becoming more and more popular as s source of household energy in many countries around the world Why is this What are the advantages and disadvantages of solar energy 67
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages If these are not taught many are at risk of dying out In your opinion is it important for everyone to learn English Should we try to ensure the survival of local lang 67
- The given bar chart illustrates the various percentage of Australian men and women among various age groups who did physical activity regularly in 2010 67
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people traveling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 483, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... same faculty. Similarly, 70% of members were female in education faculty but onl...
^^
Line 1, column 926, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: At
...een male and female staff; male was 65%.At last, looking at the data of law facult...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, similarly, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6174863388 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50379389037 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491803278689 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5036114104 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.714285714 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426966157651 0.215688989381 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.239608739958 0.103423049105 232% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153700768837 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.426966157651 0.15604864568 274% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 483, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... same faculty. Similarly, 70% of members were female in education faculty but onl...
^^
Line 1, column 926, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: At
...een male and female staff; male was 65%.At last, looking at the data of law facult...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, similarly, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6174863388 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50379389037 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491803278689 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5036114104 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.714285714 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426966157651 0.215688989381 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.239608739958 0.103423049105 232% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153700768837 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.426966157651 0.15604864568 274% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.