Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience
Helping people in need is one of the signs of love and sympathy, so many educational leaders have brought community service into the compulsory curriculum for students, especially at high school level. In my opinion, I firmly agree with this idea for some reasons below.
First and foremost, students should be taught about love and caring for the people around them, not only through words but also through real actions. In fact, it is a crucial step to help students build good personalities since more and more people have become indifferent and self-centered in modern times. In addition, they should learn to do good deeds even though it may not be financially beneficial. Through certain activities such as working as volunteers for a charity, teaching poor students languages in non-profit programs, or assisting the disabled people with shopping, students will understand the truth that the good deeds they do can be profitable in some unexpected ways.
Admittedly, it would be unnecessary to wait for the children to grow up maturely enough. Actually, not only high school level but also every level of education should be allowed to help needy people under the teachers's guidance. These activities mentioned can also create an ideal environment for students to practise establishing and maintaining their own social skills, such as commnunication skills, soft skills, and so on. Besides having new friends from these programs, students at all levels are able to keep themselves from the addictive means of modern entertainment, like Tiktok, since it has been proven to be extremely time-consuming.
All things considered, I firmly believe that unpaid community service should be widely applied at every level of education due to its educational advantages. Indeed, humanitarianism should be nurtured from very early age for the sake of a loving society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-19 | Ruveen Pathak | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | Ruveen Pathak | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-22 | Blackcytrus | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | LenaOad | 61 | view |
| 2022-02-18 | muhammadsafa2779 | 61 | view |
- The chart and table provide data about cars registered in one country over a period of time Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Number of marriages and divorces in the USA 1970 2000 Marital status of adult Americans 1970 2000 73
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to have a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In many countries people now wear Western clothes suits jeans rather than traditional clothing Why Is this a positive or negative development 90
- Number of marriages and divorces in the USA 1970 2000 Marital status of adult Americans 1970 2000 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 73, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...uld be taught about love and caring for the people around them, not only through words but also throug...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, first, if, may, so, in addition, in fact, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2861952862 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90939875538 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616161616162 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9797998404 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.833333333 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250250028535 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928031567444 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446597758998 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156547304267 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032543799279 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.