Nowadays, most people try to balance between work and other parts of their lives. Unfortunately, not many achieve this balance. What are the problems with this? Suggest some solutions to solve the problems.
Achieving work life balance is the target of many workers nowadays. Many people are unable to do so due to increasingly competitive labor market and advent of new techologies. This essay will elaborate on the consequences of as well as solutions for the phenomenon.
If people are unable to balance between jobs and private lives, they are likely to experience many psychological disturbances. First, workers today have to bear extreme pressure of heavy workload and constant update of new knowledge in order to maintain their jobs in the modern places of work. This is the main culprit of stress and mental health issues among working individuals. In addition, given the inventions of new technologies, which eliminate the boundary of place of residence and place of work, workers are made accessible to their managers at any time. The movement places workers at risk of lossing their quality time with their loved ones, which damage their social relationships and family solidarity.
Several measures can be implemented to address the negative impacts of the modern workplaces and lifestyle. The first solution is that government can impose reduced working hours on firms, which entitles people more time with their families. Another method can be used is that employers can allow their workers to work from home. By doing so, companies' owners can relieve their employees of the burden of managers' supervision, which implies staff's comfort and covenience while working, therefore improving their performance. Thirdly, workers can make use of new technologival advances to ameliorate the effects of working environment. For instance, workers can exploit programming languages to automate their tasks, increase the accuracy of their work, thereby enhancing their productivity and reducing the stress from work.
In sum, if the balance between work and personal life are impaired, people would stand a higher risk of being stressed, and relationship destruction. Cutting working hours, distance working, and utilization of coding could be harnessed to alliviate the impacts of the phenomenon.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-18 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-25 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-13 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people say team sports football have lots of benefits Others say Individual sports swimming tennis are better Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Many employees may work at home the modern technology Some people claim that it can benefit only workers not employers Do you agree or disagree ex 67
- Some people believe that technology causes more problems for modern society than it solves Do you agree or disagree 89
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l relationships and family solidarity. Several measures can be implemented to a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, third, thirdly, well, while, for instance, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47692307692 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86063509314 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578461538462 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3356373855 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.25 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214035922072 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776930472499 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508661267705 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140359793819 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373587539613 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.