Although there is a lot of translation software available, learning a language still could be advantageous. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is no denying that learning foreign languages is one of the modern-day trends. In light of this, there is a growing number of translation software and assistants to help learners with translation. Although this convenience might make studying new languages unnecessary, I would argue that learning languages are still beneficial to an extent.
There is a reason why learning foreign languages is no longer essential when appeared translation software. An advocate of this opinion might argue that translation assistants allow users to translate any languages they command. By pasting and attaching documentaries or sentences into the software, users can translate from their mother tongue to international languages and vice versa. Google translate, for example, agrees users translate two-way hundreds of languages. However, people can easily be in passive situations when those platforms help users little in communicating in person. It is also rude and disadvantageous to insert what they want to say and rely on technology to monitor the conversation.
In my opinion, learning a language still could be advantageous. This is because being bilingual enhances brain power and functions.
Concentration and memory can be improved by learning vocabulary and grammar structures. In addition, in the studying process, the brain will be trained to be sharp based on the transformation between the mother tongue and international languages. All contribute to developing an individual’s brain to be strong and more flexible.
In conclusion, learning a language would help individuals to practice a strong brain to increase memory and flexibility. Although translation assistants facilitate understanding foreign languages easier, the software is more recommended for documentary solving but not speaking and communication.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-26 | Neferti | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | minhphambinh1234 | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | Sang Sang Sang | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | Sang Sang Sang | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-23 | KhoaLe | 78 | view |
- Interviews form the basic selecting criteria for most large companies However some people think that the interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and that there are other better methods To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Many parents choose to teach their children at home rather than sending their children to school Do you think the benefits of homeschooling outweigh its drawbacks 84
- the table shows the questionnaire about the opinions of club members and general public for a new theater in one town in 2012 78
- The pictures illustrate the innovations of the Nature Museum from 2010 to 2013 61
- Fewer young people choose to work in farming What are the reasons Should young people be encouraged to do farming work 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 330, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s brain to be strong and more flexible. In conclusion, learning a language would...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, still, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80740740741 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30704863053 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574074074074 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5420401174 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297799278332 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963399786012 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639721311669 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16918477445 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447586773367 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.12 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.