The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000.
A glance at the graph provided reveals some striking similarities between the Chinese and US
birth rates during the period from 1920 to 2000. It is evident that both nations saw considerable
fluctuations in fertility, with lows during the 1940s and highs during the 1950s.
Increasing from approximately 10 percent in 1920 to 15 percent in 1935, China’s birth rate then
plunged to a low of just 5 percent in the 1940s. This was followed by a period of exponential
growth, with fertility in the country reaching a peak of 20 percent in 1950. The latter half of the
century, however, brought a sustained decline in this figure.
The US birth rate, meanwhile, fluctuated at somewhere between 11 and 13 percent prior to 1940,
before dropping sharply to less than 5 percent in 1945. The following 5 years saw a rapid climb
in this rate, to somewhere in the vicinity of 15 percent in 1950, followed by a steady fall.
It is interesting to note that while the birth rates of both countries were comparable until 1950,
the gap between the two widened after this time as fertility in China slid away.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-11 | thaiha123 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | teulimin.06 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | trucvy112233 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-04 | dhq.testbig | 78 | view |
- Topic Advertising is becoming more and more common in everyday life Is this a positive or negative development 89
- The table shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in 2012 and 2013 89
- The diagrams show how glass containers such as bottles are produced and recycled 67
- Topic Advertisements are becoming more and more common in our everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 89
- Society is based on rules and laws It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... similarities between the Chinese and US birth rates during the period from 1920 ...
^^^
Line 2, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ident that both nations saw considerable fluctuations in fertility, with lows dur...
^^^
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...percent in 1935, China’s birth rate then plunged to a low of just 5 percent in th...
^^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... was followed by a period of exponential growth, with fertility in the country re...
^^^
Line 6, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... percent in 1950. The latter half of the century, however, brought a sustained de...
^^^
Line 8, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...between 11 and 13 percent prior to 1940, before dropping sharply to less than 5 p...
^^^
Line 9, column 57, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...sharply to less than 5 percent in 1945. The following 5 years saw a rapid climb i...
^^^
Line 9, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... The following 5 years saw a rapid climb in this rate, to somewhere in the vicini...
^^^
Line 11, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th countries were comparable until 1950, the gap between the two widened after th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.796875 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65912324177 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578125 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.3669938109 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.125 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 12.0 3.83414634146 313% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23292688548 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095390440738 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974099310164 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0797628331818 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0781937600598 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.