The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation.
The maps illustrate the innovations in a student accommodation from 2010 to now. Over the period, the area witnessed fundamental changes, with the number of student bedrooms increasing and the addition of several services. These modifications are to improve the students’ living experiences.
The student accommodation has been expanded to the northwest to construct a student bedroom. Besides that, the former living room in 2010 has been replaced by another dorm, lifting the total number of student rooms to five. At the heart of the campus is still located the shared bathroom for all students to use.
In the southeast corner is still the original single bedroom for a student as it was in 2010, next to it on the left is a new en-suite room which provides a private bathroom. The kitchen located between two bedrooms in the east remained untouched through the improvement period, as well as the main entrance and the hallway in the southwest. It is also noticeable that in the south of the accommodation, a car parking has been added for students to park their cars when they return to their dorms.
- Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people say that it is more important to spend money on improving roads and motorways than public transport 78
- Many parents choose to teach their children at home rather than sending their children to school Do you think the benefits of homeschooling outweigh its drawbacks 84
- The pictures illustrate the innovations of the Nature Museum from 2010 to 2013 61
- Some people believe women are better leaders than men To which extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The maps illustrate the innovations in a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, still, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97326203209 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82601980595 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5315505135 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.333333333 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158604663353 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794163000144 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651954308916 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120315185899 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500386653348 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.