There have been many inventions in the human history, such as the wheel. Some people think the most important thing is the internet. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
The proliferation of technology in recent decades has reshaped multi-faceted aspects of human life. It is believed that the internet is the foremost creation of humanity. I somewhat disagree with this view as the role of other inventions are also of great importance.
Apart from the internet, fertilizers and new modes of transportation powered by electricity contributes greatly to the survival and flourishment of humankind. It is a fact that famine is one of the most challenging issue that has plagued humans throughout the history. With the discovery of artificial fertilizers, people are are able to enhance productivity of crops, increase the number of agricultiral products, allowing people to maintain their existence. Additionally, the increasing ubiquity of electric cars are weighed as a game changer in many dimensions. Utilization of the new means of transit can reduce a collosal amount of fume emission from conventional automobile. This not only alleviates the negative implications of the car industry on the ecological equillibrium but relieves people of the constraint of travel by traditional cars thanks to the vehicles' autopilot driving feature.
Admittedly, internet connection has paved the way for the development of other inventions such as smart devices and myriads of applications, enabling unlimited exchange of information worldwide. However, the internet alone can not improve living standards, let alone negative impacts the invention has on the society. This includes psychological illnesses and online cyber attacks. It is therefore not grounded to assert that internet is the most profound creation in the history.
In sum, I object to the belief that internet is the most significant creation of humnanity. While the invention merits people in certain ways, man-made fertilizers guarantee the supply of food and electric vehicles help balance the ecosystem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-08 | lbthuy | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-06 | scan010 | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-30 | hien3112 | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | Charles Le | 59 | view |
| 2021-04-02 | quynhtran8 | 61 | view |
- Some people think watching TV is bad for children while others think that watching TV has more beneficial effects on children Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Most of our information comes from the Internet nowadays Some people say that a large part of the information we get is incorrect Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people find advertisements amusing or annoying and they are not influenced by this when they shop To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Many people use written language in a less formal way and in a relaxed way than in the past Why is that so Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages 78
- All fathers should be entitled to time off from work when their children are born What is your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 323, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: are
...overy of artificial fertilizers, people are are able to enhance productivity of crops, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 866, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vehicles'' or 'vehicle's'?
Suggestion: vehicles'; vehicle's
...ravel by traditional cars thanks to the vehicles autopilot driving feature. Admittedl...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, while, apart from, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64236111111 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20723398373 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1755095895 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199966714656 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577902670742 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316463827024 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113552106241 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188094766312 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.