Nowadays, some people are saying that the government should subsidize fruits and vegetables in other to make healthy foods cheap, while others are saying it should be tax to unhealthy foods.
On one hand, the government’s effort to make healthy foods cheaper is a very good development. Fruits and vegetables play a major role in the good health of an individual because of the quality of life it brings to the person’s life. By making the prices of fruits and vegetables cheap, it is now possible for everyone to add this class of food to their daily diets while making attempts to live and eat healthy. The fruit juice factories will also benefit and take advantage of this reduction in price once the government takes its action on the matter. If the government reduces the prices of these things, then it will do more good than harm to the society. Health is wealth!
On the other hand, some people are saying that unhealthy food should be taxed by the government. The purchase of foods such as, sugary drinks and other unhealthy edibles will reduce drastically. In my country Nigeria, there won’t be reduction in alcohol intake until this tax comes into play. Junk foods make great contribution to obesity, yet people still want to have a bite after they have heard that it is not good health-wise. It is of essence that unhealthy foods undergo taxation, so that the people can maintain a healthy eating lifestyle which has been made cheaper by the authorities.
To conclude, my opinion regarding the discussions above is simple and direct. Subsidizing healthy foods will make it affordable for the public which in turn contributes to their well being while putting tax on unhealthy foods will help in curbing it and making it not very affordable to purchase. I have made my opinion because I feel it’s the right path to take.
- Write a letter to your friend to recommend a book to read that you have read You should include Describe the book How it can help him her Where can he get it from 73
- Some people believe that certain old buildings are worth preserving more than other buildings What type of old buildings are worth preserving Do the advantages of preserving these buildings outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Internet contains a lot of information however sometimes this information is inaccurate or wrong Do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Write a letter to your friend who wants to visit your hometown In your letter say When is the best time to visit Recommend someplace to stay Invite her him to your house 73
- Some people believe that certain old buildings are worth preserving more than other buildings What type of old buildings are worth preserving Do the advantages of preserving these buildings outweigh the disadvantages 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'taxed'?
Suggestion: taxed
...p, while others are saying it should be tax to unhealthy foods. On one hand, th...
^^^
Line 7, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...de, my opinion regarding the discussions above is simple and direct. Subsidizing ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, still, then, well, while, i feel, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83280757098 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55887884823 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526813880126 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6576308459 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.428571429 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.44840291921 0.244688304435 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151754501048 0.084324248473 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164837734132 0.0667982634062 247% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.319695447897 0.151304729494 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.180850164046 0.056905535591 318% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.