The maps show the changes of an office building between the present and the future
The maps illustrate information regarding how an office building will be transformed in the future, compared to the present. Overall, it is readily apparent that this construction is scheduled to experience extensive renovations and rearrangements, the most noticeable of which is the amalgamation of interior space and the addition of new facilities.
Concerning the front of the building, four offices will be demolished to amalgamate into two larger offices. Additionally, the main entrance which is originally on the right side of the building will be relocated to the center, sandwiching two new offices.
Regarding the back of the building, the storeroom will maintain the status quo whereas two new offices will be erected to replace the kitchen and the canteen. Moreover, toilets which are currently situated in front of the storeroom will be changed positions to the back right corner of the building.
In terms of the external space, while the grass contiguous to the side entrance will be cleared and converted into an outdoor seating area with chairs, the remaining grass will be merged into the internal space. In this newly extended area, there will be a coffee machine adjacent to the storeroom, and a meeting area with two chairs at the front.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-26 | letrang250191 | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | letrang250191 | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | letrang250191 | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-26 | thaocbh | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-26 | thaocbh | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in an European country betwwwn 1999 to 2004 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy
- Scientists believe that computers will become more intelligent than human beings Some people find it is a positive trend while others think it is a negative development Discuss both points and give your own opinion 84
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction between many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in an European country between 1979 and 2004 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, regarding, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23039215686 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90677181354 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544117647059 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7860719202 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.375 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110583344776 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623046522824 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886119907777 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0781015955347 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602040403981 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, regarding, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23039215686 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90677181354 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544117647059 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7860719202 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.375 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110583344776 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623046522824 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886119907777 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0781015955347 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602040403981 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.