Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots.
Is this a negative or positive development?
The increasing use of robots for performing tasks at home and work has been a major development in recent years. This trend has been driven by advancements in technology and an increasing demand for efficiency and productivity. While the use of robots in various tasks has had many benefits, it has also raised concerns about its impact on employment and the nature of work.
One of the positive aspects of the increased use of robots is that they can perform repetitive and dangerous tasks much faster and more efficiently than humans. This can lead to improved productivity and cost savings, especially in industries such as manufacturing and logistics. Robots can also work 24/7, which can be particularly beneficial for businesses operating in a global market.
However, there are also negative consequences associated with the increased use of robots. One of the main concerns is job displacement, as robots can perform many tasks that were previously performed by humans. This can lead to widespread unemployment and a decrease in the demand for certain skills. Furthermore, the use of robots can also result in the widening of income inequality, as those who own and control the robots may benefit, while those who are displaced from their jobs may struggle.
In conclusion, the increasing use of robots for performing tasks at home and work is a complex issue that has both positive and negative consequences. While it has the potential to improve efficiency and productivity, it also raises concerns about employment and the nature of work. It is therefore important that we approach this issue with caution and consider the potential impacts on both individuals and society as a whole. This will require a close collaboration between industry, government, and academia, and a commitment to responsible innovation and ethical principles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-11 | transcendenceeee | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | pwlihnkt | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | quan12341234 | 61 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | caigicungduoc | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-04 | hungdung2507 | 73 | view |
- Technology can be a threat to the survival of a language but it can also serve as a powerful tool to preserve even restore languages Discuss the statement and give your opinion 78
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down. Others, however, believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals. Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion. 67
- Traffic on roads has become a problem in every country in the world What can be done to reduce the amount of traffic at a society level and at an individual level 78
- The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. 67
- As mass communication and transport continue to grow societies are becoming more and more alike leading to a phenomenon known as globalization Some people fear that globalization will inevitably lead to the total loss of cultural identity To what extent d 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, may, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24915824916 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05563300493 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508417508418 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3509349088 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.357142857 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350439613115 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120106574894 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113706826186 0.0667982634062 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215528213453 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468776213601 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.