Some countries achieve international sports by building specialised facilities to train top athletes, instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Do you think this is positive or negative development?
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is observed that global prestige is achieved by constructing specific facilities to upskill elite athletes in lieu of offering sports facilities for the public to use in some parts of the world. I would argue that this has detrimental impacts on the health of inhabitants, despite the fact that this can create private conditions for athletes to prosper.
On the one hand, there are several compelling reasons why the erection of specialised facilities for top sportsmen sounds great. First and foremost, in order to achieve global accomplishments, athletes have made endless strenuous efforts to train hard as well as the competitiveness from others. Therefore, it is sensible for them to practice in training areas with specialised equipment which maximise their's health. Additionally, providing special facilities is believed to indicate the respectation of the countries for outstanding athletes who have brought many glorious successes to a nation. For example, the Vietnamese government allocates funds to establish training areas for Hoang Anh Gia Lai football teams for the purpose of not only improving football players' health but also paying homage to the achievement that they have performed in international tournaments.
On the other hand, this propensity can induce many noticeable drawbacks. The first one worth mentioning is that the shortage of open areas for playing sports may lead to adversely affect general well-being. As a result, citizens are more prone to physical as well as mental illness, which means they have to suffer from heavy burdens caused by medical care expenses. Furthermore, it is fair for the government to allocate their funds to equip sports facilities for ordinary people due to the contributions they have made to society. For instance, all people have to pay tax income and other duties, so it is sensible to provide them with training equipment to help enhance the general well-being of all residents.
In conclusion, although investing in specialised facilities for top sportspersons can contribute to their optimal performances and improve a nation's standing, I hold firmly agree that the health care of residents is still more important than ever.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-18 | honguyenlily | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-06 | thaokim2003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-03 | Cuberates | 73 | view |
- Some countries achieve international sports by building specialised facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Do you think this is positive or negative development Discuss both views and give your opinio 84
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1864.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40289855072 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00639380266 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579710144928 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.0444753283 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.384615385 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5384615385 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3076923077 7.06120827912 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19609915687 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762139325745 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519280883076 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13298856067 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545948445541 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.