The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004
and 2009.
Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare changes in the dominant means of transportation used for going to
one university between 2004 and 2009.
Overall, What stands out from the graph is that there were 2 opposite trends for these figures.
While Bus and Car both had downward trends, Other vehicles experienced a rise gradual
over the period given.
Looking at the graph for more detail, Car is the most popular vehicle that people in university
preferred over other means of transport, with 51% in 2004, however, after 5 years, this figure
suddenly declined and was lower than that a half times in the same period. Following that, the
figure for Bus witnessed raking second with 33% at the beginning before reaching the highest
place at 46% in the next 5 years.
Then turns to the other three features, starting at 9% of people using bicycles to travel to
university, after that, it witnessed progress and still keep the rank at third with 16% in the
period of 5 years. Besides that, the proportion of people walking and using by Train was
minimal and that percentage changed negligibly at 6 and 4 percent, respectively at the end of
the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-06 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 million Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons
- The given line graph illustrates clients average every year spending on mobile phone national and international land line and services 67
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 73
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, look, second, still, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86802030457 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48773434683 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629441624365 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.1677516599 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1428571429 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 14.0 3.83414634146 365% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0917425389376 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474492241125 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640957194539 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0388182585506 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647757935178 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.