The expansion of multinational companies and increase in globalization produce positive effects to everyone. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
It is argued that the prosperity of global corporations and internationalization do numerous wonders for human life. From my standpoint, I strongly see eye to eye with the aforementioned statement because of reasons relating to a higher level of employment and enhanced cross-cultural communication skills.
One major ground behind the rising of this trend is that it brings more precious opportunities for the youth to land sufficient jobs. By that I mean, if the government accelerates the process of integrated merchandise trade, there are more and more foreign firms that would invest a huge amount of money in expanding various branches in the countryside. As a result, those corporations definitely require a high level of workforce, they will need to recruit more local employees to operate the business. In terms of workers, they would land a stable job with a lucrative income, far beyond a promising advance in career prospects. For example, in Tan Phu town, thanks to the opening new clothes branch, today many local workers do not need to move away from their loved ones to find a suitable job in the metropolitan areas. They can receive a better job with well-paid in their hometown with ease.
Another key aspect is that people have a chance to develop multi-cultural communication skills as globalization is promoted. The dramatic pace of globalization facilitates for youngsters to get exposed to different cultures, which helps them approach foreign languages as well as customs at their fingertips. Therefore, it enables them to acquire more knowledge and insight into varying international practices. As they get accustomed to the ubiquity of cultures in their working environment and society, they would become more able to show their empathy and tolerate cultural differences. At the company level, globalization leads to a more diverse range of potential business partners and diversifies their investment portfolios, which contributes to their profit generation. Accordingly, having global partnerships is essential for businesses to compete in the growing international market.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that this trend is a positive development for every individual since it offers more jobs in local areas and stimulates better cross-cultural communication. Therefore, the government should encourage the process of globalization and multinational companies to set up in their countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-13 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2022-09-28 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
- The charts give information about two genres of TV programmes watched by men and women and four different age groups in Australia 78
- Topic Fewer young people choose to work in farming What are the reasons Should young people be encouraged to do farming work 89
- Topic The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints from passengers Summarise the information by 67
- Line graph The percentage of people accessing news from 4 sources TV Radio Newspaper Internet 89
- The table below gives information about the values NZ of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, so, therefore, well, for example, i mean, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2063.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5308310992 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31991178911 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600536193029 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7521618909 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.9375 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3125 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109627150707 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0379084363081 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311290837606 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0767238515026 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277653695726 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, so, therefore, well, for example, i mean, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2063.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5308310992 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31991178911 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600536193029 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7521618909 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.9375 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3125 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109627150707 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0379084363081 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311290837606 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0767238515026 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277653695726 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.