The average standard of people's health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is argued that people in the future is likely to have a lower health standard in average compared to it is now. This essay disagrees with that prediction because people can access to the most update health knowledge in the future and the health condition is becoming easier to monitor due to technological advancement.
Firstly, people in the future can benefit from the latest health knowledge. We are living in an information era, which means it cannot be easier to learn the most update health knowledge. By a few clicks, we can read the latest scientific research report online. Moreover, some rumours about health have been denied because of advancement of scientific research. For instance, previously people believed that fat was the key reason behind heart diseases; however, after studying over the decades, scientists have discovered that the excessive intake of sugar is the real cause of cardiovascular diseases. It is predicted that people in the future can access to proven health knowledge in an easier way to improve the health standard.
Secondly, as the technologically advanced, people can monitor their health statue easier compared to the past. Some health services and monitors that were reserved for the riches have been democratised. In other word, these services are more accessible to average people because of lower price. Such as, the price of the body check service has dropped from over $20000 in 2000 to merely $2000 nowadays. In my views, health services will become more common and affordable in the future.
To calculate, this essay disagrees with the statement that people in the future is likely to have a lower health standard compared to present, because they have access to the latest health knowledge and also they are able to monitor their health condition easily.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-30 | UYEN NGUYEN DO TO | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | UYEN NGUYEN DO TO | 61 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | vuhungbo | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | Areeb Rooman | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | Areeb Rooman | 73 | view |
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main fe
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 84
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport 73
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13513513514 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6314856919 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493243243243 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7200954112 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.571428571 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293894471352 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112406060538 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112480657718 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224428773118 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111641463124 0.056905535591 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.