Should teachers be able to physically discipline students if they misbehave?
Nowadays, whether children should be physically disciplined by elders, especially teachers, or not is a highly debated topic. Some people suggest physical punishment is not an ideal approach whereas some argue that it helps young students develop good manners in a short time. As I see it, I completely disagree with this idea and in this essay, I will support my side by providing examples.
First and foremost, physical punishment for misbehavior is considered a violent action toward innocent students. On top of all, it can ruin the trust built between a teacher and a pupil. For instance, a student will lose his confidence to interact with the teacher to express his feelings and perspectives. Especially with a strict and stern-faced teacher, the classroom will not have its friendly and lively atmosphere anymore. Moreover, being physically punished in front of a crowd can trigger any student to be traumatized for his entire teenage life.
Secondly, in most cases, teachers intend to show their desire to see improvement in students’ behaviors. In fact, it causes more harm than good. Despite following the rules at school with the fear of punishment, students will think they can act as they would like to outside the campus. Therefore, teachers should try to pass an intentional message to the youngsters by using a gentle and effective approach.
On the other hand, some guardians and elders believe there are many positives as well. Especially in this era, with the trend of social media and widespread inappropriate violent content, adults are more mischievous and reluctant to accept the advice of the old generation. Consequently, corporal punishment is the only option left after the rest failed to proceed.
To conclude, there are a variety of punishments that can be used to improve a student’s behaviors and manners, such as verbal warning, giving detention or school-related manual tasks, and informing his guardians. I consider the responsibilities lie with parents as they have much more authority and control over children. Therefore, in my opinion, teachers ought not to be allowed to physically discipline students for their misbehaviors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-11 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-11 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
| 2024-06-11 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
| 2024-05-11 | AnnaAlysia | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-08 | annaalysia007 | 89 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- These days in many countries fewer and fewer people want to become teachers particularly in secondary schools What are the reasons for this and how could the problem be solved 61
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site 79
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ne students for their misbehaviors.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, for instance, in fact, such as, in most cases, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34870317003 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99069917806 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619596541787 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8681924575 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.111111111 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2777777778 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304766078311 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840354598891 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082527230521 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15720806703 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824210894592 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.