The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
The chart illustrates the results of a survey about people’s habit of buying and drinking coffee or tea in five main cities in Australia namely Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart.
As can be seen from the chart, in generally, citizens in Melbourne consumed coffee and tea most while residents in Adelaide city used coffee as well as tea the least.
To begin with, habitants in Melbourne city spent money for when they went to café shop accounted for the largest rate, with roughly 63% while they spent for buying instant and fresh coffee in last 4 week with about 48% and 42%, respectively. Besides, percentage of citizens in Hobart city paying money at a café took up around 62%, which was the second highest proportion when they pay around 49% for buying instant coffee and 38% fresh coffee in last 4 weeks. Moreover, residents of Sydney seem like going to café the third position of the chart with 61% whereas the figure for instant coffee and fresh one was just above 45% and 49%, respectively.
On the other hand, the rate of people who lived in Adelaide spent least money for café shop with just under 50% while they prefer instant coffee more with exactly 50% and the data of buying fresh coffee was 34% which hold the second least proportion. Finally, those who lived in Brisbane made of 55% for going to café whilst percentage of these citizens paid least money for fresh coffee, with approximately 34% and the figure for instant coffee took up about 52%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-07-09 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
2023-11-12 | Daniel3003 | 78 | view |
2023-08-28 | susanti | 78 | view |
2023-08-15 | anhalice | 67 | view |
2023-08-15 | Kaythlyn | 67 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- the charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in household in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise in the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparati 73
- The maps show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 67
- In some countries owing a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be case Do you think this is positive or negative situation 56
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 61, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'spent the least'.
Suggestion: spent the least
...he rate of people who lived in Adelaide spent least money for café shop with just under 50%...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 355, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'paid the least'.
Suggestion: paid the least
...afé whilst percentage of these citizens paid least money for fresh coffee, with approximat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, moreover, second, third, well, whereas, while, in general, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1238.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 259.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77992277992 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29110810938 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505791505792 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.9 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 27.7716637262 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.857142857 112.824112599 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.0 22.9334400587 161% => OK
Discourse Markers: 17.2857142857 5.23603664747 330% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181759658927 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118462319665 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119251485349 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173344943912 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133874699324 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.2329268293 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 61.2550243902 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.