The chart shows the number of people working in 4 sports sectors in an Australian town in 2015

Essay topics:

The chart shows the number of people working in 4 sports sectors in an Australian town in 2015.

The chart illustrates the number of the two types of work, which are unpaid and paid workers in 3 main sports categories, including vouchers, referees, managers, and other sections in Australia town in 2015.

As can be seen from the chart, local residents had a tendency to work as coachers in both volunteer and paid staff that was far much higher than the others. In contrast, referees were not gaining popular among those mentioned jobs.

Noticeably, the figure of residents who gave their choices for coachers was taken the lead in 2015, accounting for more than 75% in terms of volunteer work. In addition, this figure was also much more far-reaching than the referee's volunteer job, over two times as greater as the number of referees volunteering. Inhabitants put these jobs at the top priority option when it came to mentors’ paid jobs, as nearly half. Meanwhile, the number of referees employees remained at the lowest figure, which was nearly the same as managers figure, at around 38%.

Regards to managers’ volunteer work, the number of people stood at approximately half, roughly less than one-in-ten in comparison to the other section. Especially, the other sections’ paid jobs were placed at the second position with merely 45% in 2015.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-30 lanee1107 67 view
2023-08-08 cassiexo 67 view
2023-07-27 Giang Tran 73 view
2023-07-27 Giang Tran view
2023-05-05 tieuquynh 84 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, second, so, while, in addition, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10096153846 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68074008786 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620192307692 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8363079074 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.888888889 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172199386585 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685626456797 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719225277089 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120250436059 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752659707225 0.0819641961636 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.