The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart given compares a nation in terms of the quantity of trips made by pupils to commute to and from schools by utilising distinct types of transport over a period of 20 years from 1990 to 2010.
It is noticeable from the chart that using cars and walking were the most widely-preferred ways to go to and from schools among students. Additionally, a downward trend was recorded in all categories except for the figure of car passenger.
In 1990, there were over 12 million walking trips made by pupils, which overtook the number of bus trips by a wide margin, at nearly 7 million. Likewise, the quantity of cycling and walking and bus shared a comparable figure, at approximately 6 million, compared to nearly 4 million car trips made by pupils.
In 2010, students became indulged in utilising cars to commute to and from schools with over 11 million trips, whereas the number of walking ones plummeted to exactly 6 million. Meanwhile, the figure for walking and bus matched with a roughly similar trend to about 3 million. At the same time, the quantity of bus trips underwent an insignificant drop to around 5 million, at which point it outnumbered that of cycling ones by two to one, at 2 million.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-26 | HASAN.511 | view | |
| 2023-05-08 | vuhungbo | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-08 | vuhungbo | 79 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | Areeb Rooman | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-18 | khanhkhanhkhanhkhanhkhanh | view |
- The percentage of 3 types of crimes car theft house burglary street robbery in England Wales from 1970 to 2015 89
- Governments should ban dangerous sports Others think that people should have the freedom to do any sport activity Discuss both sides and give your opinion 89
- The plans below show a small theatre In 2010 and the same theatre in 2012 73
- Nowadays more people move away from their friends and families for work Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000 79
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 420, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ch point it outnumbered that of cycling ones by two to one, at 2 million.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, whereas, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71226415094 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74080147074 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52358490566 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1355295111 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.875 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167573672196 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823988656726 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673028808469 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11965925205 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522127134224 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 420, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ch point it outnumbered that of cycling ones by two to one, at 2 million.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, whereas, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71226415094 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74080147074 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52358490566 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1355295111 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.875 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167573672196 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823988656726 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673028808469 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11965925205 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522127134224 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.